Centered around the core topic of “application scenarios and risk management of government AI agents”, this paper systematically explores the following five aspects: types of risks and collaborative governance pathways for government AI agents, preventive effects against security risks of government AI agents, risk maps of government AI agents and their overarching governance strategies, power restructuring and administrative risks brought about by the application of intelligent technologies in grassroots governance, and scenariobased risks and trustworthy governance frameworks for government AI agent applications. It reveals that the risk governance of government AI agents is not merely a technical issue, but a systemic project involving institutional design, power allocation, ethical norms and social trust. A dynamic balance must be struck between technological innovation and public value, with the principle of “safety, stability and orderliness” guiding the highquality development of government AI agents.

The method of mutual interpretation between traditional Chinese classics and Marxist classics created by Mao Zedong in “On Practice” and “On Contradiction” takes the basic principles of Marxism as the foundation, the traditional Chinese philosophy as the medium and the practical issues as the orientation. Through the mutual interpretation between the two types of classics, it enriches and develops the category, connotation, thinking and practice of Marxist philosophy as well as realizes the reconstruction of traditional resources and the nationalized expression of Marxist philosophy. In “On Practice” and “On Contradiction”, this method unfolds from the three dimensions of concept, method and narration and constructs a philosophical theory that integrates scientific truth and national cultural characteristics. It enlightens us that to construct Chinas independent knowledge system, we must adhere to the guidance of Marxist methodology to consolidate the theoretical foundation, activate the mechanism for the modern transformation of traditional resources to strengthen cultural subjectivity, and build a practiceoriented cycle of knowledge production to promote paradigm innovation.

Prudently advancing the construction of a strong cultural nation is of significant value in the era for continuously enhancing the spiritual strength of the Chinese people, realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and promoting the development and progress of human civilization. This major strategic task not only addresses the theoretical question of “what kind of strong cultural nation to build,” but also responds to the practical inquiry of “how to build a strong cultural nation.” From the theoretical perspective, the construction of a strong cultural nation embodies five aspects: it is valueoriented towards enhancing the level of social civilization, it is driven by the cultivation of an innovative culture, it focuses on promoting the prosperity and development of cultural undertakings and industries, it carries the important mission of jointly inheriting and promoting Chinese culture, and its ultimate aim is to enhance Chinas cultural soft power and enriching the spiritual and cultural life of the people. These five aspects support each other and are organically unified, collectively forming the theoretical coordinates for the construction of a strong cultural nation. From the practical perspective, to advance the construction of a strong cultural nation, we must follow Xi Jinping Thought on Culture and firmly uphold the Partys leadership over culture, keeping cultural development on the right course with an unwavering stance. In the “Two Combinations,” we should continuously enrich and develop the cultural form of the Chinesestyle modernization so as to lay a solid foundation in both cultural roots and theoretical groundwork. We should stimulate innovative vitality for cultural prosperity and development in the process of inheriting excellent traditional Chinese culture, carrying forward revolutionary culture and developing advanced socialist culture. We should strengthen the overall effectiveness of cultural construction in the process of comprehensively enhancing ideological leadership, spiritual cohesion, value appeal, and international influence. We should embark on a path towards becoming a global cultural powerhouse based in China by grasping the distinctive characteristics of the Chinesestyle modernization.

As an overarching strategic resource underpinning national development, intellectual property has been deeply embedded in the overall landscape of the Chinesestyle modernization. In terms of theoretical logic, further comprehensively deepening intellectual property reform undertakes the mission of advancing the highquality development of the Chinesestyle modernization, manifests the humanistic orientation of the Chinesestyle modernization, and embodies the global governance arena for advancing the Chinesestyle modernization. In terms of practical logic, the reform should be coordinated and aligned with the five defining features of the Chinesestyle modernization, namely a huge population, common prosperity for all, the coordination of material and culturalethical advancement, harmony between humanity and nature, and taking the path of peaceful development. In terms of the path to be followed, guided at the top level by the Resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Further Deepening Reform Comprehensively to Advance the Chinesestyle Modernization, the reform should uphold the systematic strategic vision of “system integration and coordinated advancement”, grasp the reform methodology of “for the people, relying on the people, and sharing the outcomes with the people”, give play to the primary traction role of intellectual property reform in driving the reform of the economic system, and adhere to the two fundamental safeguards of the Partys leadership and lawbased governance in all respects, thereby bringing the building of China into an intellectual property powerhouse into resonance with the process of the Chinesestyle modernization.

With the deepening of digitalization, it is necessary to deepen the application of digital technologies in rural governance and restructure the mechanisms of mediated governance. The present study adopts the field research methods and takes Rulin Town in Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, as a case to analyze the generative logic of mediated governance in rural grassroots organizations. It is found that the “Rulin Model,” led by the rural grassroots organizations of the CPC, adopts a “fourfold restructuring” mechanism—involving the functional restructuring of governance entities under the local Party committees coordination, the media restructuring enabled by digital technology, the organizational restructuring through gridbased integration, and the institutional restructuring through performance evaluation—to form a rural grassroots governance mechanism characterized by the “threeinone integration” of “gridbased platforms, informationenabled tools and accountabilitybased safeguards.” This practical process is guided by the logic of mediated governance rather than a purely technological logic. It not only addresses realworld challenges in grassroots governance, such as “fragmented administration” and “digital disconnection”, but also provides a practical model that involves organizational, technological and institutional integration for research on mediated governance.

The 2025 Central Rural Work Conference explicitly called for “incorporating regular support into the coordinated implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy”, signaling that Chinas policy to prevent rural residents from lapsing or relapsing into poverty has entered a new phase of deep integration with rural revitalization and its underpinning logic has shifted from “effective transition” to “coordinated implementation”. Based on a longitudinal study of 30 districts and counties across 7 provinces and municipalities from 2021 to 2025, this paper systematically evaluates the effectiveness of regular support in underdeveloped regions during the transition period and analyses its structural challenges. The results indicate that significant progress has been made in monitoring, assistance and support, policy implementation and asset management; however, challenges remain, including policy disparities, deepseated industrial contradictions, bottlenecks in monitoring efficiency, difficulties in asset management and dual “spatialecological” constraints. Accordingly, a strategic framework of “dual support and precise coordination” has been established: developmentoriented support is used to stimulate endogenous momentum, whilst social security safeguards the basic livelihood of the people and is integrated into the five dimensions of rural revitalization. These two pillars of developmentoriented support and social security, guided by the governance philosophy of “tiered and categorized” approaches,  are allocated differentially according to the specific conditions of various regional types, thereby achieving precise coordination.

The development of artificial intelligence has profoundly reshaped the paradigms of spiritual production innovation and become the most pivotal variable empowering spiritual production. The internal mechanism of AI empowering spiritual production should start with analyzing the core elements of spiritual production and the dilemmas of traditional spiritual production, so as to clarify the integration logic between artificial intelligence and spiritual production as well as its value manifestation. Nevertheless, its practical application may be faced with multiple predicaments: value alienation of spiritual production driven by technological and capital logic, rights infringement of spiritual production subjects in humanmachine collaboration, cultural imbalance of spiritual production under technological monopoly, and potential risks of spiritual production arising from inherent defects of intelligent technology. In response to these practical concerns, it is imperative to construct systematically a sound development path: anchoring the humanistic orientation of AIenabled spiritual production through value guidance, optimizing the tool system via technological adaptation, and improving the governance framework through institutional guarantee. The coordinated and complementary development of material civilization and spiritual civilization will then be facilitated.

The use of artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication has raised questions about the subjectivity of adjudicators and the risk of subject alienation in legal hermeneutics. Judicial artificial intelligence, as an imitation of the human mind, presupposes the adjudicator as an epistemologically isolated subject and reduces legal hermeneutics to computation. From the perspective of fundamental ontology, however, the adjudicator is not a Cartesian cognitive machine, but a situated subject whose interpretive capacity is grounded in historical tradition, concrete context, and intersubjective dialogue. Legal hermeneutics, therefore, begins from preunderstanding and unfolds as the contextual concretization of facts and norms, as well as the formation of normative consensus through dialogue. Lacking preunderstanding and a reflective structure, judicial artificial intelligence performs only decontextualized computation and monological adjudication, rather than genuine legal hermeneutics. This deficiency may entrench algorithmic bias, obscure individual justice, and weaken communicative rationality. Accordingly, it is necessary to reaffirm the adjudicators responsibility in legal hermeneutics, emphasize the corrective role of analogical reasoning, and construct mechanisms of intersubjective dialogue in digital justice.

During the “15th FiveYear Plan” period, the key tasks of digital China construction include establishing a sound basic system for data elements, promoting the deep integration of the digital economy and the real economy, and fully implementing the “Artificial Intelligence +” initiative. Against this backdrop, the integration of education, technology and talents constitutes the foundation and prop for the digital China construction, which, in turn, provides strategic guidance and application scenarios for the integration. The integration and the construction form a coordinated demanddriven and supplysupporting development pattern. The digital China construction makes more concrete and pointed demands for the integration of education, technology and talents, emphasizing that the demands of allround digital transformation are systematically responded by the coordinated linkage and value transformation of education, technology and talents, while its practical feedback keeps optimizing the collaborative mechanism of education, technology and talents. The integration of education, technology and talents must be based on the overall layout and systematic planning of digital China construction, with the digital economy as the foundation, the digital government as the driving force, the digital culture as the leadership, the digital society as the support, and the digital ecology as the guarantee so that all parties jointly exert efforts and coordinate with each other to advance the comprehensive construction and indepth development of digital China.