Abstract：ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of poor Rwave progression(PRWP) and reversed Rwave progression(RRWP).MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on 183 patients diagnosed with PRWP( PRWP group) and 98 RRWP patients(RRWP group) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from September 2018 to December 2018. Results of ultrasonic cardiogram, chest Xray and coronary angiography were utilized to determine whether there was ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, and other lesions. Then statistical analysis was carried out on the data.ResultsThrough chisquare test, the incidence of myocardial infarction in RRWP group was found higher than that in PRWP group, with statistically significant difference(P<005); the incidence of ventricular hypertrophy did not vary significantly between the two groups(P>005); the normal percentage of RRWP group was lower than that of PRWP group, with statistically significant difference(P<005).ConclusionPRWP and RRWP are clinically significant in suggesting myocardial infarction and ventricular hypertrophy. RRWP is more common in the patients with cardiac organic lesions. RRWP is more accurate than PRWP in indicating myocardial infarction, and has certain clinical practical value in making auxiliary diagnosis of anteroseptal or anterior myocardial infarction.
2019, Vol. 28 
