Abstract：Karl Marx, with his critical theories, continues to be a horizon that cannot be transcended as long as the capitalism survives. As a radical critical narrative, Jacques Derrida's deconstruction is naturally attracted by Marx in discourse and communication. The communication as such consists of three aspects: the awareness that history is open and producing, the purport of drastic critique to the reality, and the hope for the liberation of mankind. However, there are fundamental discrepancies between Marx and Derrida in their political stances and key theoretical points. Both the communication and the discrepancies bring us two edifications: one is to adhere to the methodological paradigm of “prerequisite-predominance” in historical materialism and to grapple with them dialectically, and the other is to be cautious with the production of theories and to undo them constantly.
付清松. 辩护者还是颠覆者——德里达同马克思理论质点异同的分疏及启示[J]. 江苏大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 16(2): 64-67.
FU Qing-Song. Communication and Discrepancy between Derrida and Marx and its Edifications. Journal of Jiangsu University（Social Science Editi, 2014, 16(2): 64-67.
[1]德里达.马克思的幽灵[M].何一，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2008.[2]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集：第44卷[M].北京：人民出版社，2001.[3]德里达.书写与差异[M].张宁，译.北京：读书·生活·新知三联书店，2001.[4]胡大平.虚无·主义·Display [J].江海学刊，2013（3）：5-15.[5]伊格尔顿.当代西方文学理论[M].王逢振，译.北京：中国社会科学出版社，1988.[6]伊格尔顿.历史中的政治、哲学、爱欲[M].马海良,译.北京：中国社会科学出版社，1999.[7]杜小真,张宁.德里达中国演讲集[M].北京：中央编译出版社，2003.[8]Negri，A.“The Specters Smile” in Ghostly Demarcations: A Symposium on Jacques Derridas Specter s of Marx[M].New York: Verso, 1999.[9]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第30卷 [M].北京：人民出版社，1995.[10]余虹,杨恒达,杨慧林.问题:第1辑 [M].北京：中央编译出版社，2003.[11]胡大平.幽灵化的马克思：抵抗的政治话语——析德里达对马克思的解构式解读[J].江苏行政学院学报，2003（3）：16-20.
2014, Vol. 16 
