目的: 探讨中性粒细胞CD64指数在鉴别类风湿关节炎（RA）合并感染中的临床价值。方法: 收集62例RA患者及30名健康对照者外周血样本，其中RA活动期24例、稳定期20例、合并感染18例。应用流式细胞术检测外周血中性粒细胞CD64指数的表达水平，并分析其与实验室指标的相关性。ROC曲线分析中性粒细胞CD64指数鉴别诊断RA合并感染的敏感性和特异性。 结果： RA合并感染组中性粒细胞CD64指数为8.23±3.39，显著高于RA活动期组（2.61±0.94）、RA稳定期组（1.78±0.76）和健康对照组（1.65±0.61），P均<0.001；RA合并感染组中性粒细胞CD64指数与白细胞计数呈正相关（r=0.462，P=0.037）；革兰阴性杆菌感染患者中性粒细胞CD64指数为9.06±3.39，虽高于革兰阳性球菌感染者（6.07±2.50），但差异无统计学意义（t=1.782，P=0.094）；ROC曲线显示中性粒细胞CD64指数诊断RA合并感染的敏感性和特异性为94.4%和91.7%。结论： 中性粒细胞CD64指数可作为鉴别RA合并感染与RA活动期的一个有效指标。
Abstract
Objective： To investigate usefulness of neutrophil CD64 index as a marker to differentiate between infection and disease flare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods：The peripheral blood specimens from 24 RA patients with active stage, 20 RA patients with stable stage, 18 RA patients with infection and 30 healthy controls were collected. Neutrophil CD64 index was quantitatively measured using flow cytometry. The correlation between neutrophil CD64 index and laboratory data in RA patients was analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of neutrophil CD64 index in diagnosis of RA with infection was calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Results：Neutrophil CD64 index in RA patients with infection (8.23±3.39) were significantly higher than active stage RA patients , stable stage RA patients and healthy controls . The expression of neutrophil CD64 index was positively correlated with WBC in RA patients with infection (r=0.462， P=0.037). Although neutrophil CD64 index in infection patients with Gram negative bacilli was higher than Gram positive coccus, there was no statistical difference ［(9.06±3.39) vs (6.07±2.50), t=1.782, P=0.094］. The sensitivity and specificity of neutrophil CD64 index in diagnosis of infection in RA patients was 94.4% and 91.7%, respectively. Conclusion：Neutrophil CD64 index may be a marker to differentiate between infection and disease flare in patients with RA.
关键词
类风湿关节炎 /
簇分化抗原64 /
中性粒细胞 /
感染
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
［1］Mokuda S, Doi O, Takasugi K. Simultaneous quantitative analysis of the expression of CD64 and CD35 on neutrophils as markers to differentiate between bacterial and viral infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol, 2012,22(5):750-757.
［2］Hoffmann JJ.Neutrophil CD64:a diagnostic marker for infection and sepsis. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2009,47(8):903-916.
［3］汪文娟, 王浩, 陈哲. CD64指数/WBC在小儿败血症早期诊断与预后判断中的应用价值. 检验医学, 2013,28(5):416-419.
［4］Streimish I, Bizzarro M, Northrup V,et al. Neutrophil CD64 with hematologic criteria for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Am J Perinatol, 2014,31(1):21-30.
［5］尤海燕, 裘影影, 吴玲, 等. CD64指数在鉴别系统性红斑狼疮继发感染和病情活动中的意义. 江苏医药, 2014,40(1):53-55.
［6］Hussein OA, ElToukhy MA, ElRahman HS. Neutrophil CD64 expression in inflammatory autoimmune diseases: its value in distinguishing infection from disease flare. Immunol Invest, 2010,39(7):699-712.
［7］李德红, 李勇, 居军, 等. 中性粒细胞CD64在类风湿关节炎合并感染者中的表达及意义. 中华检验医学杂志, 2013,36(1):77-79.
［8］Komiya A, Matsui T, Horie K, et al. Neutrophil CD64 for monitoring the activity of nontuberculous mycobacteria infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol, 2014,24(5):770-774.
［9］Matsui T, Ohsumi K, Ozawa N, et al. CD64 on neutrophils is a sensitive and specific marker for detection of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol, 2006,33(12):2416-2424.
［10］Nishino J, Tanaka S, Kadono Y,et al. The usefulness of neutrophil CD64 expression in the diagnosis of local infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice. J Orthop Sci， 2010，15(4):547-552.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(1424 KB)
