|
|
|
| Construction of an Objective Evaluation Model of Calligraphy——From the Perspective of Evaluation Scale and Dimension |
| School of Teacher Education,Jiangsu University |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The existing evaluation modes of calligraphy,from Yu Jianwu＇s three-rank criterion to Kang Youwei＇s six-rank standard,from Hong Pimo and Gong Zhimin＇s＂Element＂theory to the contemporary ＂comprehensive evaluation＂by national exhibitions,are impressionistic rather than objective ones.They are too general or abstract,and as a result too elusive to be easily applicable.So we try to adopt the scientific ap-proach to have a quantitative evaluation of aesthetic object and element so that a relatively objective evaluation mode is formulated that involves such factors as skill,comparison and position.For this purpose,the aesthetic value must be separated from realistic interest so that only aesthetics and aesthetic interest will be taken into account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]尹冬民.略论古代书法批评的三大特征[J].山东教育学院学报,2008(5):71-73. [2]张岱年 程宜山.中国文化与文化争论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990.4. [3]中国科学院《自然辩证法通讯》杂志社.科学传统与文化[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1983.159-160. [4]应旦红.书法品评的维性价值模式[EB/OL].http://www, dy- shuhua, eom/dispbbs, asp.9 boardid = 13&Id = 3857,(2007-04-19)[2009-05-10]. [5]朱以撒.评价的尺度[N].书法报,2005-01-06(3). [6]朱中原.多维视野中的当代书法批评[J].乌鲁木齐职业大学学报,2005(6):98-101. [7]康有为.广艺舟双楫[M]..历代书法论文选续编[C].上海:上海书画出版社,1979.105-106. [8]张捷.《书法客观批评模式的构建》[J].东南大学学报,2004年,第6期:. [9]Kantowitz B H, Roediger H L, Elmes D G. Experimental Psychology [ M ]. St Paul, USA : West Publishing Company, 1997 : 150 - 151. |
|
|
|
2010, Vol. 12 
