水泵及泵装置效率换算方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.2012.06.012

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (1318 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要分析了传统效率换算公式的理论依据和有关标准推荐的效率换算方法,发现传统水泵效率换算式理论具有表达不完整、经验性重、通用性缺乏等问题;比较了由不同换算公式计算得到的最优工况点泵水力损失比,发现Medici式、Fromm式及两种Moody式原模型效率差值较大,其他各式较小,Ackeret式最小．研究提出了泵及泵装置“分部效率换算方法”,从流体流动特性出发,介绍了3种不同流动区摩阻系数表达式,提出经数学处理的便于应用的简化公式;从泵内流动特性出发,分析和论证了摩阻系数的确定依据,研究了泵比例系数和摩阻系数对水泵效率换算的影响;推导提出了另一种效率常数计算方法;针对相同的原、模型水泵及泵装置实例,给出不同方法的效率换算结果,分析不同方法差异的原因及适用性．研究结果表明:相较于Ackeret式和Hutton式,泵比例系数对“分部效率换算法”的影响较小;采用“分部效率换算法”时,以任何流动区的公式计算摩阻系数其总效率并无明显差异．

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陆伟刚
	严登丰
	甄峰

关键词 ：水泵效率, 泵装置效率, 效率常数, 效率换算

Abstract： The theoretical bases of existing efficiency scaling formulas and several scaling methods recommended in some industrial standards for pumps were analyzed. It was found that those formulas are incompletely mathematical expression, experiencedominated and less universal, etc. The hydraulic loss ratios and efficiency at the best efficiency point computed with different efficiency scaling formulas were compared, and it was identified that the efficiency of the prototypes scaled from the models by using Medici's and Fromm's and Moody's formulas shows quite difference compared with the measurements. The efficiency of the prototypes estimated by the rest formulas is less difference from the tests, in which Ackeret's formula gives a minimum error. A flow regimedepended efficiency scaling method for pump and its system was put forward, in which three formulas of skin friction factor for three flow regimes were introduced according to essentials of fluid mechanics, and then the corresponding mathematically simplified formulas were proposed for they to be applied conveniently. Based on the internal flow characteristics in pumps, the basis for determining the skin friction factor was analyzed and argued, and influences of the proportional constants of pump performance parameters and skin friction factor on the efficiency scaling were studied; eventually an additional method for estimating the efficiency coefficient was resulted. For the same prototype and model of pump and its system, the efficiencies scaled with those different methods were predicted; the reasons for difference in efficiency estimated and feasibility of the methods were analyzed. The results indicate that the proportional constants have less influence on the flow regimedepended efficiency scaling method compared with Ackeret's and Hutton's formulas. Thus, as the flow regimedepended efficiency scaling method is applied, the efficiency scaled with a skin friction factor in any flow regimes doesn't seem to show significant difference.

Key words： pump efficiency pump system efficiency efficiency coefficient efficiency conversion

收稿日期: 2012-08-08 出版日期: 2012-11-30

基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（50279045）

通讯作者: 严登丰（1940—），男，江苏盱眙人，教授，博士生导师（yzdxydf@yahoo.com.cn），主要从事泵与泵站工程研究.

作者简介: 陆伟刚（1964—），男，江苏苏州人，副教授，博士（wglu@yzu.edu.cn），主要从事泵站工程研究.

引用本文:

陆伟刚, 严登丰, 甄峰. 水泵及泵装置效率换算方法[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2012, 30(6): 677-682. LU Wei-Gang, YAN Deng-Feng, ZHEN Feng. Efficiency scaling method for pumps and their systems. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engin, 2012, 30(6): 677-682.

链接本文:

http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/pgjx/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.2012.06.012 或 http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/pgjx/CN/Y2012/V30/I6/677

［1］葛强, 周君亮, 李龙. 基于黑箱法的泵装置水力特性换算［J］. 河海大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 37(6): 727-730.

Ge Qiang, Zhou Junliang, Li Long. Conversion of hydraulic characteristics of pump sets based on black box method［J］. Journal of Hohai University: Natural Sciences, 2009, 37(6): 727-730. (in Chinese)

［2］Jafarzadeh B, Hajari A, Alishahi M M, et al. The flow simulation of a lowspecificspeed highspeed centrifugal pump［J］. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011,35(1):242-249.

［3］Zhang Desheng, Shi Weidong, Chen Bin, et al. Unsteady flow analysis and experimental investigation of axialflow pump［J］. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser B, 2010,22(1):35-43.

［4］Santolin A, Cavazzini G, Ardizzon G, et al. Numerical investigation of the interaction between jet and bucket in a Pelton turbine［J］. Journal of Power and Energy, 2009,223(6):721-728.

［5］Ferro L M C, Gato L M C, Falco A F O. Design and experimental validation of the inlet guide vane system of a mini hydraulic bulbturbine［J］. Renewable Energy, 2010,35(9):1920-1928.

［6］Qian Zhongdong, Wang Yan, Huai Wenxin, et al. Numerical simulation of water flow in an axial flow pump with adjustable guide vanes［J］. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2010,24(4):971-976.

［7］张仁田, 张平易, 阎文立. 大型泵站系统性能参数的换算方法［J］. 农业机械学报, 1999,30(2): 49-53.

Zhang Rentian, Zhang Pingyi, Yan Wenli. Research on conversation method of performance parameters for largescale pumping station system［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 1999,30(2): 49-53.(in Chinese)

［8］李彦军, 黄良勇, 袁寿其, 等. 大型泵与泵装置效率特性预测理论分析［J］. 农业机械学报, 2009, 40(1): 44-49.
Li Yanjun, Huang Liangyong, Yuan Shouqi, et al. Theoretical analysis of efficiency characteristic prediction on large pump and pump installation［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2009, 40(1): 44-49. (in Chinese)

［9］李龙, 杨雪林, 李丹. 考虑粗糙度影响的水泵原模型效率换算［J］. 河海大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 38(3): 327-331.

Li Long, Yang Xuelin, Li Dan. Efficiency conversion methods for prototypes and models of water pumps considering influence of surface roughness［J］. Journal of Hohai University: Natural Sciences, 2010, 38(3): 327-331. (in Chinese)

［10］严登丰. 泵及泵装置特性预测［J］. 排灌机械工程学报, 2012, 30(3): 315-323.

Yan Dengfeng. Performance prediction for pump and pumping system［J］. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2012,30(3): 315-323.(in Chinese)

［11］吴持恭. 水力学［M］. 4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008.

［12］江苏省水利厅. 南水北调淮阴三站主机泵开始安装［EB／OL］. (2008-12-02)［2012-08-01］. http:／／www.jiangsu.gov.cn／shouye／rdgz／msmy／200812／t20081202-287578.html.

［13］Munson B R, Young D F, Okiishi T H, et al. Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics［M］. 6th ed. New York: Wiley, 2009.

［14］刘宁, 汪易森, 张纲. 南水北调工程水泵模型同台测试［M］. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2006.

［15］关醒凡. 现代泵理论与设计［M］. 北京: 中国宇航出版社, 2011.