|
|
|
| The status quo and development orientation of "the Belt and Road" university strategic alliance: the perspective of value philosophy
|
| LIU Zhimin，ZHU Yicai |
| （College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract At present, "the Belt and Road" university strategic alliance is in a new period of steady development. However, in the long run, to comprehensively promote the construction of "the Belt and Road" university strategic alliance, many difficulties need to be solved, including the lateness of national system construction, the incapability of sustainable development, the imbalance of higher education development, and the lowlevel construction of the information platform, etc. Theoretically, "the Belt and Road" university strategic alliance contains four dimensions: the target community, interest community, responsibility community and value community. Compared with other three dimensions, the value community is more complicated and is full of hardships, fundamentally because it is more involved in the issue of value consensus. From the perspective of value philosophy, longterm dynamic evolution and careful cultivation are necessary to achieve the value consensus beyond individual interests. The essence of "the Belt and Road" university strategic alliance is the process in which the object attributes meet the subject demands. Only the alliance integrating into the overall ecosystem of the alliance field actively and improving the "development" capability based on the "task" of meeting the subjective demand, can we promote exchanges and cooperation of "the Belt and Road" higher education by dialogue accommodation and selfimprovement, and realize more value creations. Specifically, in order to ensure the sustainable development of "the Belt and Road" university strategic alliance, it is necessary to intensify the toplevel design and institutional improvement, optimize the mechanism for sustainable development, make an effective design of the alliance action model, and extend the alliance′s public discourse space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 14 
