|
Abstract Nowadays, as a "hard" element, the project has infiltrated into the academic evaluation of university organizations, such as title evaluation, scientific research award, talent introduction and so on. Through a series of organizational action, such as restraint, incentive, rank, price, unconventionality, universities have manifested multiple forms of the project system affecting university organizations, which has turned the project system as a financial system into a kind of "projectization" thinking and spirit. Under the influence of "projectization" thinking, university academics may present a "performance" state because of the normative rationality of the project; the abstract function of the project in practice makes its existence in the academic field more prioritized and legal than that of scholars and academics, which are often in a secondary position; under the cover of project symbols, the specific content and true meaning of academics are less concerned, "good" and "bad" of academics may be difficult to be distinguished effectively. Therefore, academic evaluation should strengthen peer identification and inspection mechanism centered on achievements themselves, promote and strengthen flexible reform, return the "project" to the project system, and give full play to the role of the project system rather than "projectization" in promoting and supporting higher education and academic development and change of universities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
