级配碎石变形特性的试验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7775.2022.01.015

摘要
图/表
参考文献(10)
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (2445 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要针对级配组成、水的质量分数及密实度等3个因素对级配碎石的影响，采用精密非粘结材料分析仪（precision unbound materials analyzer, PUMA）试验和重复荷载加州承载比（California bearing ratio, CBR）试验方法，研究了级配碎石的抗变形能力.借助累积塑性变形和弹性形变指标，对比分析2种试验异同点.试验结果表明：在荷载作用前期，级配碎石材料抗变形能力受荷载作用的影响显著，随着荷载作用次数不断增大，其影响逐渐减小；PUMA试验与重复荷载CBR试验累积塑性变形结果基本一致，而弹性应变指标存在差异；PUMA试验中弹性应变受级配碎石材料上述3个因素共同影响，重复荷载CBR试验中弹性应变受级配碎石密实度的影响；对级配碎石变形特性精度要求较低时，可选择重复荷载CBR试验研究级配碎石材料变形特性；由于PUMA设备和加载均接近实际工况，因此对级配碎石变形特性精度要求较高时，推荐选用PUMA试验测试方法.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	康兴祥1
	马骉1
	李宁2
	司伟1
	王小庆1

关键词 ：级配碎石, 抗变形能力, PUMA试验, 重复荷载CBR试验, 对比分析

Abstract：The effects of three factors of gradation composition, water mass fraction and compactness were investigated by precision unbound materials analyzer(PUMA) test and California bearing ratio(CBR) test method with repeated loading. The deformation resistance of graded aggregates was investigated by cumulative plastic deformation and elastic deformation tests，and the similarities and differences between the two tests were compared and analyzed. The results show that the deformation resistance of the graded aggregates is significantly influenced by the load in the early stage of loading, and the influence is gradually decreased with the increasing number of loadings. The cumulative plastic deformation results of the PUMA test are basically consistent with those of the repeated loading CBR test, while the elastic strain indexes are different. The elastic strain in the PUMA test is influenced by the combination of the above three factors of the graded aggregates, while the elastic strain in the repeated loading CBR test is only influenced by the compactness of graded aggregates. If the requirements for the accuracy of deformation characteristics of graded aggregates are low, the repeated load CBR test can be chosen to study the deformation characteristics of graded aggregates.Since the PUMA equipment and loading are close to the actual working conditions, the PUMA test method is chosen when the requirements for the accuracy of deformation characteristics of graded aggregates are high.

Key words： graded aggregates non-deformability PUMA test repeated load CBR test contrastive analysis

收稿日期: 2020-07-22

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目（51708044）；陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目（2020JM-251）；西藏自治区自然科学基金资助项目（XZ2017ZRG-117）；西藏天路科学创新发展基金资助项目（XZ2019TL-G-04, XZ2019TL-G-05）

作者简介: 康兴祥（1993—），男，江苏盐城人，硕士研究生（2019121174@chd.edu.cn），主要从事路面结构与材料的研究. 马骉（1972—），男，甘肃会宁人，教授，博士生导师（mabiao@chd.edu.cn），主要从事路面结构与材料的研究.

引用本文:

康兴祥1，马骉1，李宁2，司伟1，王小庆1. 级配碎石变形特性的试验[J]. 江苏大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(1): 101-106. KANG Xingxiang1, MA Biao1, LI Ning2, SI Wei1, WANG Xiaoqing1. Test of deformation characteristics of graded aggregates[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University(Natural Science Eidtion) , 2022, 43(1): 101-106.

链接本文:

http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/xbzkb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7775.2022.01.015 或 http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/xbzkb/CN/Y2022/V43/I1/101

［1］	常艳婷，陈忠达，张震，等. 不同成型方法级配碎石的抗变形性能[J]. 武汉大学学报（工学版）, 2017, 50(2): 251-256.
	CHANG Y T, CHEN Z D, ZHANG Z, et al. Study of anti-deformation properties of grade macadam with diffe-rent molding methods[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2017, 50(2): 251-256.（in Chinese）
［2］	申结结，郑传峰，胡孝阳，等. 半刚性基层与柔性基层沥青路面结构对比分析[J]. 公路, 2019, 64(1): 9-12.
	SHEN J J, ZHENG C F, HU X Y, et al. Comparison and analysis of asphalt pavement structure for semi-rigid base and flexible base[J]. Highway, 2019, 64(1): 9-12. （in Chinese）
［3］	LI N, MA B, WANG H, et al. Development of elasto-plastic constitutive model for unbound granular materials under repeated loads[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 23：100347.
［4］	何兆益，唐伯明. 柔性基层沥青路面非线性特性及模量研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2001，18(1): 13-16.
	HE Z Y, TANG B M. Research on nonlinear property and granular base modulus of flexible base asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2001，18(1): 13-16. （in Chinese）
［5］	谢远勇，李改. 级配碎石动态CBR试验研究[J]. 公路工程, 2014, 39(2): 5-8.
	XIE Y Y, LI G. Experimental research on dynamic CBR of aggregate crushed stone[J]. Highway Engineering, 2014, 39(2): 5-8.（in Chinese）
［6］	ARAYA A, MOLENAAR A, HOUBEN L. Characte-rization of unbound granular materials using repeated load CBR and triaxial testing[C]∥Proceedings of Geo-shanghai International Conference. USA: ASCE, 2014:355-363.
［7］	LI Q, STEIN J, GARG N，et al. Characterization of airfield subbase materials using precision unbound material analyzer (PUMA)[C]∥ Proceedings of International Conference on Highway Pavements and Airfield Technology. New York,USA: Amer Soc Civil Engineers, 2017: 370-381.
［8］	李宁，马骉，李瑞，等. 基于PUMA的单级和多级加载模式下碎石粒料性能研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2019, 36(3): 62-72.
	LI N, MA B, LI R, et al. Study on performance of unbound granular materials under single-stage and multi-stage loading modes based on PUMA[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 36(3): 62-72. （in Chinese）
［9］	KWON J, KIM S H, TUTUMLUER E, et al. Characteri-zation of unbound aggregate materials considering physical and morphological properties[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2017, 18(4): 303-308.
［10］	王小庆，马骉，李笑盈，等. 水泥稳定碎石抗压回弹模量取值模型的建立[J]. 中国科技论文, 2018, 13(19): 2233-2241.
	WANG X Q, MA B, LI X Y, et al. Development of a model on the compressive resilient modulus value of the cement-stabilized aggregate[J]. China Science Paper, 2018, 13(19): 2233-2241.（in Chinese）