|
|
|
| Effect of gradual ischemic postconditioning on reperfusion arrhythmia in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention triggered by right coronary artery occlusion |
| Basit BANGASH，YU Zong-liang, XU Hao-jun, ZHU Jian-zhong, GU Ming, ZHOU Wei-wei, WANG Qiang, GU Hui-min |
| (Department of Cardiology, the Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan Jiangsu 215300, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract
［Abstract］Objective： To observe the effect of gradual ischemic postconditioning(IP) on reperfusion arrhythmia in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which were triggered by right coronary artery occlusion. Methods：A total of 95 patients undergoing primary PCI were randomly divided into three groups after recanalization of occluded right coronary artery：the gradul IP group(n=36) using the angioplasty balloon denation and inflation 1 min/1 min, 30 s/30 s and 15 s/15 s, which performed IP through gradul time within the first minutes of reflow; the IP group(n=35) IP were performed by 3 episodes of denation 1 min and inflation 1 min with the angioplasty balloon; the control group (n=24) undergoing routine PCI. Reperfusion arrhythmia，ST segment regression (SumSTR) ,CKMB and corrected TIMI frame count(CTFC) were analyzed between groups. Results：Incidence of reperfusion arrhythmia and usage of antiarrhythmic drugs were significantly lower in the two IP groups\[ ventricular tachycardia(5.6%,5.7% vs 25.0%,P<0.05),sinus bradycardia(41.7%,45.7% vs 79.2%,P<0.05),usage of antiarrhythmic drugs(11.2%,17.1% vs 41.7%, P<0.05)\]. CTFC\[(24.39±5.21),(25.10±8.72) vs (31.74±8.41), P<0.05\] and values of peaks CKMB \[(91.9±81.2)U/L,(94.1±72.7) U/L vs ( 117.4±81.6) U/L, P<0.05\] were all significantly lower in the two IP groups than in control group while SumSTR\[(57.6±19.5)%, (56.3±17.7)% vs (46.1±22.7)%, P<0.05\] were higher in the two IP groups than control. Conclusion： Right coronary artery occlusion triggered IP can significantly reduce reperfusion arrhythmia in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Gradual IP groups had better results than those of IP groups furthermore(P>0.05).
|
|
Received: 26 April 2016
|
|
|
|
| ［1］Gerczuk PZ, Kloner RA. An update on cardioprotection: a review of the latest adjunctive therapies to limit myocardial infarction size in clinical trials\[J\]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2012 , 59(11):969-978.［2］Hahn JY, Song YB, Kim EK, et al. Longterm effects of ischemic postconditioning on clinical outcomes: 1year followup of the POST radomized trail \[J\].Am Heart J, 2015, 169(5): 639-646.［3］中华医学会心血管病学分会，中华心血管病学杂志编辑委员会．经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南（2009）\[J\].中华心血管病杂志，2009, 37(1):4-25.［4］钱俊，张亚臣. 再灌注心律失常的发生机制、类型与治疗\[J\]. 心血管病学进展，2008, 29(4)：567-570.［5］Penna C，Mancardi D，Raimondo S，et al．The paradigm of postconditioning to protect the heart\[J\]. J Cell Mol Med，2008, 12(2):435-458.［6］于宗良，许浩军，朱建中，等.渐进缺血后适应对经皮冠状动脉介入术患者心脏的保护作用［J］.中国中西医结合急救杂志，2015,22（7）：390-393.［7］张国明，王禹，李天德,等．后适应渐进模式通过线粒体途径减轻大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤\[J\].中华心血管病杂志，2010, 38（6）:539-544.［8］张国明，王禹，李天德,等．渐进延长后适应通过MAPK途径减轻再灌注损伤\[J\].中华急诊医学杂志,2013,22（8）:859-864. |
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 26 
