基于drop-off ddPCR方法检测急性髓系白血病C-KIT基因N822位点突变及其临床应用

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4233 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Guide

Abstract Objective： To develop a quantitative drop-off ddPCR technique for identifying of mutations at the C-KIT gene′s N822 locus in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and assess the methodological performance and its clinical value. Methods： A pair of primers and probes were designed for the exon 17 of C-KIT gene. The system and reaction conditions of drop-off ddPCR were optimized. The method′s specificity, sensitivity, and repeatability were assessed. The established method was used to test bone marrow samples from 140 newly diagnosed AML patients previously Sanger sequenced, and the results were further confirmed by next generation sequencing (NGS). In addition, the KIT-N822 mutation frequency was monitored dynamically in 3 patients by dropoff ddPCR. Results： The optimal annealing temperature of drop-off ddPCR for the KIT-N822 mutation was 54 ℃. With good linearity, the limit of detection was 10.12 copies/μL, and the limit of blank was 1.62 copies/μL. Among 140 AML samples, Sanger sequencing detected only 2 positive cases (1.43%), however, ddPCR identified 7 positive (5.00%) with mutation frequency of 0.29%~7.41%, among which NGS found only 3 positive cases (2.1%) with variant allele frequencies ranging from 1.26% to 8.00%. The results showed that the C-KIT mutation frequency decreased significantly or even to 0 when the treatment reached complete remission. Conclusion： The drop-off ddPCR method for detecting KIT-N822 mutations was developed with better methodological performance and higher sensitivity than both Sanger sequencing and NGS. It maybe employed for monitoring measurable residual disease and guiding treatment following remission in positive patients.

Key words：

Received: 16 April 2023

Fund:

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Ting1
	JIN Ye1
	YUAN Qian2
	3
	YAO Dongming2
	3
	XIANG Helin1
	XIAO Gaofei2
	3
	YU Di1
	LENG Jiayan1
	LIN Jiang2
	3
	QIAN Jun1
	2
	3

Cite this article:

LI Ting1,JIN Ye1,YUAN Qian2等. Drop-off ddPCR-based method for detecting mutations in C-KIT gene N822 locus and its clinical application in acute myeloid leukemia

[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University(Medicine Edition), 2024, 34(02): 151-155,160.

URL:

http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/xbyxb/EN/ OR http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/xbyxb/EN/Y2024/V34/I02/151

［1］Qin YZ, Zhu HH, Jiang Q, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of cKit mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive largescale study from a single Chinese center［J］. Leuk Res, 2014, 38(12): 1435-1440.

［2］Lennartsson J, Rnnstrand L. Stem cell factor receptor/cKit: from basic science to clinical implications［J］. Physiol Rev, 2012, 92(4): 1619-1649.

［3］Boissel N, Leroy H, Brethon B, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of cKit, FLT3, and Ras gene mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBFAML)［J］. Leukemia, 2006, 20(6): 965-970.

［4］Ayatollahi H, Shajiei A, Sadeghian MH, et al. Prognostic importance of cKit mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review［J］. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther, 2017, 10(1): 1-7.

［5］Tan Y, Liu Z, Wang W, et al. Monitoring of clonal evolution of double cKit exon 17 mutations by droplet digital PCR in patients with corebinding factor acute myeloid leukemia［J］. Leuk Res, 2018, 69: 89-93.

［6］Cairoli R, Beghini A, Grillo G, et al. Prognostic impact of cKit mutations in core binding factor leukemias: an Italian retrospective study［J］. Blood, 2006, 107(9): 3463-3468.

［7］中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组. 中国成人急性髓系白血病（非急性早幼粒细胞白血病）诊疗指南（2021年版）［J］. 中华血液学杂志, 2021, 42(8): 617-623.

［8］Heuser M, Freeman SD, Ossenkoppele GJ, et al. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party［J］. Blood, 2021, 138(26): 2753-2767.

［9］Armbruster DA, Pry T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation［J］. Clin Biochem Rev, 2008, Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S49-S52.

［10］Medinger M, Passweg JR. Acute myeloid leukaemia genomics［J］. Br J Haematol, 2017, 179(4): 530-542.

［11］Allen C, Hills RK, Lamb K, et al. The importance of relative mutant level for evaluating impact on outcome of KIT, FLT3 and CBL mutations in corebinding factor acute myeloid leukemia［J］. Leukemia, 2013, 27(9): 1891-1901.

［12］Rulina AV, Spirin PV, Prassolov VS. Activated leukemic oncogenes AML1ETO and cKit: role in development of acute myeloid leukemia and current approaches for their inhibition［J］. Biochemistry (Mosc), 2010, 75(13): 1650-1666.

［13］Su L, Gao SJ, Li W, et al. NPM1, FLT3ITD, CEBPA, and cKit mutations in 312 Chinese patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia［J］. Hematology, 2014, 19(6): 324-328.

［14］Xu J, Zheng J, Fu X, et al. Inhibition of N822K T>A mutationinduced constitutive cKit activation in AML cells triggers apoptotic and autophagic pathways leading to death［J］. Int J Med Sci, 2019, 16(5): 757-765.

［15］Welch JS. Mutation position within evolutionary subclonal architecture in AML［J］. Semin Hematol, 2014, 51(4): 273-281.

[1]	. [J]. Journal of Jiangsu University(Medicine Edition), 2024, 34(02): 99-103,110.