|
|
|
| The Possibility and Theoretical Construction of Philosophy of History——A Comparison Based on Disciplinary Features of Philosophy and History |
| School of Marxism,Yanshan University |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Philosophy differs from history in that the former reasons on concept,and in narration,examples and explanations are not important,whereas history focuses on the representation of past events that the beginning,development and disappearing of veritable historical events are important in narration. Because of their differences,they always attack each other：philosophers think historians give too much attention to specific historical events and ignore the logos,while historians consider philosophers put their own invention and apriori creation into history. However,they do not deny that there is a complementary relationship between philosophy and history,and that the two disciplines can be converged （an idea represented by Croce）. Croce insists on the convergence of philosophy and history,but he rejects the establishment of philosophy of history. This viewpoint is one-sided and the philosophy of history is not only possible but also has internal structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录,第1卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959.. [2]康德 邓晓芒译.纯粹理性批判[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.170-171. [3]黑格尔 贺麟 译.小逻辑[M] 2版[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980.40. [4]傅斯年.历史语言研究所工作之旨趣[M]..傅斯年全集:第3卷[C].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2003.9-10. [5]兰克 刘北成 陈新.论历史科学的特征[M].刘北成,陈新.史学理论读本[C].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.. [6]黑格尔 王造时 译.历史哲学[M].上海:世纪出版集团,上海书店,2006.. [7]李守常.史学要论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.. [8]克罗齐 傅任敢 译.历史学的理论和实践[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.. [9]柯林伍德.某某哲学的观念,特别是历史哲学的观念[M].陈新.当代西方历史哲学读本[C].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006.13. |
|
|
|
2010, Vol. 12 
