Abstract：As social practices and public policies related to the commons' interests, pension insurance system should take intergenerational justice as its basic value of justice. Intergenerational justice includes intergenerational equity and intergenerational efficiency, of which the former is the nature of sustainable social development and basic requirements of intergenerational justice, and the latter can not undertake this task. With the combination of urban and rural pension insurance system, China's basic old-age insurance system is becoming increasingly inclusive, but there is no sound solution to the unfair burden between generation and generation with the intergenerational conflicts on the rise.
和红. 代际正义视域下养老保险制度转型研究[J]. 江苏大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 16(1): 52-57.
HE Hong. On the Transformation of Social Pension from the Perspective of Intergenerational Justices. Journal of Jiangsu University（Social Science Editi, 2014, 16(1): 52-57.
［1］Casamatta, C.， Pestieau. Political sustainability and the design of social insurance［J］. Journal of Public Economics, 2000 (75):341-364.［2］Borelia. The distributional impact of pension system reforms:an application to the Italian case［J］. Fiscal Studies, 2004(25):415-437.［3］Feldstein, Liebman, J.B. The Distributional Aspects of Social Security and Social Security Reform［M］. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2002.［4］程永宏.现收现付制与人口老龄化关系定量分析［J］.经济研究,2005(3):57-68.［5］蒋云赟.养老保险个人账户调整对我国财政体系代际平衡状况的影响［J］.经济理论与经济管理,2007(12): 46-50.［6］彭浩然,陈斌开.鱼和熊掌能否兼得:养老金危机的代际冲突研究［J］.世界经济,2012(2):84-97.［7］约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义［M］.南京:译林出版社, 2000.［8］Aron,H.The social insurance paradox［J］.Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science, 1966(32):371-392.［9］李绍光.养老金制度与资本市场［M］.北京:中国发展出版社,1998.
2014, Vol. 16 
