|
|
Analysis of the relationship between blood pressure circadian rhythm abnormalities in preeclampsia pregnant women and perinatal infant outcomes |
HUANG Jun, JU Wen-dong, XIONG Xiao-ying, CHEN Ang, WU Li-feng |
HUANG Jun1,JU Wen-dong2,XIONG Xiao-ying3, CHEN Ang1,WU Li-feng2 (1. Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2. Department of Internal Medicine, 3. Obstetrical Department, the Affiliated Zhongshan Boai Hospital of Southern Medical University, Zhongshan Guangdong 528403, China) |
|
|
Abstract Objective To discuss the effect of blood pressure circadian rhythm abnormalities in preeclampsia patients on perinatal infant outcomes. Methods A total of 217 preeclampsia patients in hospital were selected in the research,including 99 cases with mild preeclampsia and 118 cases with severe preeclampsia. Other 57 pregnant women of concurrent hospital delivery were selected as the control group. The ambulatory blood pressure of all patients during day and at night were monitored.All patients were classified by three groups, dipper type, non-dipper type and antidipper type, according to the circadian rhythm of blood pressure. Results The incidence of nondipper type and antidipper type in group of preeclampsia patients was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.001).The incidence of various adverse perinatal infant outcomes were higher in patients with anti-dippers type blood pressure. The incidence of adverse perinatal infant outcomes in patients with anti-dipper type were markedly higher compared with patients from dipper and non-dipper type(both P<0.05). Conclusion Circadian rhythm abnormalities adversely affected the outcome of perinatal infants. Therefore, more attention should be focused on anti-dipper type patients. It will be helpful for maternal and infants′ safety by strengthening efforts to reduce nocturnal blood pressure and grasping the timely opportunity to terminate the pregnancy.
|
Received: 08 February 2013
|
|
|
|
\[1\] Thilaganathan B, Wormald B, Zanardini C, et al. Earlypregnancy multiple serum markers and secondtrimester uterine artery Doppler in predicting preeclampsia\[J\]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115(6): 1233-1238.\[2\] 尹琳,李波,纳志英,等. 非杓型高血压患者运动时的心血管反应\[J\]. 江苏实用心电学杂志,2011,20(2):84-86.\[3\] 万继荣,方志松,李洁芳,等.动态血压和动态心电图同步监测妊娠期高血压疾病研究[J].广东医学, 2007, 28(8): 1264-1266.\[4\] 乐杰.妇产科学\[M\]. 7版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2008:92.\[5\] Hermida RC,Ayala DE,Iglesias M. Circadian rhythm of blood pressure challenges office values as the “gold standard” in the diagnosis of gestational hypertension\[J\]. Chronobiol Int,2003, 20(1): 135-156.\[6\] 刘云梅,于春梅. 妊娠期高血压病的危险因素\[J\].中国社区医师:综合版, 2007, 9(12): 3.\[7\] Ohkubo T, Hozawa A, Yamaguchi J, et al. Prognostic significance of the nocturnal decline in blood pressure in individuals with and without high 24h blood pressure: the Ohasama study\[J\]. J Hypertens,2002,20(11): 2183-2189.\[8\] GoldmanWohl DS, Ariel I, Greenfeild C, et al. Lack of human Leukocyte antigenG expression in extravillous trophoblasts is associated with preeclampsia\[J\].Mol Hum Reprod, 2000, 6(1): 88-95.\[9\] Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Preeclampsia\[J\]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9461): 785-799. \[10\] Owen J, Baker SL Hauth JC, et al. Is indicated or spontaneous preterm delivery more advantageous for the fetus?\[J\]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1990, 163 (3): 868-872.\[11\] 严小丽, 张力, 刘兴会, 等. 重度子痫前期终止妊娠时机探讨\[J\]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2006, 7(6): 414-417. |
|
|
|