Abstract：To treat translation as cross-cultural rewriting is no other than to break the inherent expectation of translation embodied in the traditional ideas about translation. It is to treat translation as an intercultural practice and translated text as intertext. This paper tries to investigate the performance of the rewriting translation at various cultural and literary levels from the viewpoint of interculturality so as to find a more valid ways to understand the rheology and hybridity of cross-cultural communication.
［1］程志民，江怡.当代西方哲学新词典［M］.长春：吉林人民出版社，2003.［2］Lefevere, A.Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame［M］. New York: Routledge, 1992.［3］阿拉斯·戴尔·麦金太尔.谁之正义？何种合理性？［M］.北京：当代中国出版社，1996.［4］Calinescu, M. Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, AvantGarde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism［M］.Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1987.［5］Giddens, A. The Consequences of Modernity［M］.Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990.［6］钱钟书.林纾的翻译［M］.北京：商务印书馆，1981［7］周蕾.妇女与中国现代性［M］.蔡青松，译.上海：上海三联书店，2008.［8］季进.我译故我在：葛浩文访谈录［J］.当代作家评论，2009（6）：45-62.［9］佛克马.中国与欧洲传统中的重写方式［J］.文学评论，1999（6）：144-149.［10］邓巨，秦中书.苏珊·巴斯奈特翻译思想述评［J］.四川文理学院学报：社会科学，2007（3）：104-106.［11］Lefevere., A.Why waste our time on rewrites? the trouble with interpretation and the role of rewriting in an alternative paradigm［C］∥ Hermans, T. The Manipulation of Literary Translation. London ＆ Sydney: Croom Helm, 1985:215-243.
2013, Vol. 15 
