|
|
|
| Electric shock identification method based on probabilistic neural network and wavelet analysis |
1. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China; 2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Vocational University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830013, China
|
|
|
|
Abstract To solve the problem that the existing residual current protection device was difficult to identify electric shock accidents, a new method of electric shock identification based on wavelet high-frequency distribution characteristics and probabilistic neural network(PNN) was proposed. The S-transform was used to analyze the spectral characteristics of the residual current signal including the moment of electric shock, which was found that the high-frequency component of the residual current signal at the time of electric shock had sudden change in amplitude. The wavelet highfrequency distribution of each layer was extracted through the multi-scale frequency window provided by the wavelet multi-resolution analysis. To describe the electric shock accident, the normalized processing of each layer of wavelet highfrequency distribution mutations was used to accumulate and quantify the high-frequency characteristics of the first 5 layers of the residual current signal. Taking full account of the randomness of the time of electric shock accidents, the extracted wavelet features were divided into categories. A PNNbased electric shock accident recognition model was constructed, and the network smoothing parameters in the defined domain were optimized according to the specified step. The mean clustering method was also used to optimize the network structure. The results show that there is significantly sudden change in the amplitude of the residual current signal above 500 Hz at the time of electric shock. After normalization, the cumulative sum of the amplitude mutations of the wavelet high-frequency distribution of each layer can well describe the amplitude sudden increase in the corresponding stage of the wavelet high-frequency distribution of each layer. The optimal smoothing parameter interval of the established PNN network model is from 0.15 to 0.29, and the best corresponding identification rate of electric shock accidents is 95.5%.
|
|
Received: 24 January 2021
|
|
|
|
| ［1］ |
LI C L, DU S H, LIAO C Y. Impacts of distribution network unbalanced impedance on action performances of residual current operated device[C]∥Proceedings of the 2008 3rd International Conference on Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies, doi: 10.1109/DRPT.2008.4523757.
|
| ［2］ |
李春兰,叶豪,王成斌,等.基于猪触电试验的人体触电规律研究[J].江苏大学学报(自然科学版),2019, 40(5):553-558,565.
|
|
LI C L, YE H, WANG C B, et al. Human electric shock law based on pig electric shock experiment[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 40(5): 553-558,565. (in Chinese)
|
| ［3］ |
李春兰,夏兰兰,王成斌,等. 基于椭圆域分割的触电电流混沌检测方法研究[J].电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(15): 69-76.
|
|
LI C L, XIA L L, WANG C B, et al. Study on chaos detection method of electric shock current based on elliptic domain segmentation[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(15):69-76. (in Chinese)
|
| ［4］ |
关海鸥, 李伟凯, 杜松怀, 等. 基于HilbertHuang变换的生物触电电流检测模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(14): 202-209.
|
|
GUAN H O, LI W K, DU S H, et al. Detection model of biological electric shock current based on HilbertHuang transform[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(14): 202-209. (in Chinese)
|
| ［5］ |
韩晓慧, 杜松怀, 苏娟, 等. 触电信号暂态特征提取及故障类型识别方法[J]. 电网技术,2016,40(11): 3591-3596.
|
|
HAN X H, DU S H, SU J, et al. Fault transient feature extraction and fault type identification for electrical shock signals[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(11): 3591-3596. (in Chinese)
|
| ［6］ |
刘永梅, 杜松怀, 盛万兴. 基于SVM神经网络融合反馈的触电电流检测方法[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(5): 1972-1977.
|
|
LIU Y M, DU S H, SHENG W X. Prediction method of electric shock current based on SVM and neural network fusion feedback[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(5): 1972-1977. (in Chinese)
|
| ［7］ |
关海鸥, 刘梦, 李春兰, 等. 基于小波包变换和量子神经网络的触电故障类型识别模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(5):183-190.
|
|
GUAN H O, LIU M, LI C L, et al. Classification recognition model of electric shock fault based on wavelet packet transformation and quantum neural network[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(5):183-190. (in Chinese)
|
| ［8］ |
卢其威, 王涛, 李宗睿, 等. 基于小波变换和奇异值分解的串联电弧故障检测方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017,32(17): 208-217.
|
|
LU Q W, WANG T, LI Z R, et al. Detection method of series arcing fault based on wavelet transform and singular value decomposition[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017,32(17):208-217. (in Chinese)
|
| ［9］ |
MISHRA D P, SAMANTARAY S R, JOOS G. A combined wavelet and datamining based intelligent protection scheme for microgrid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 7(5): 2295-2304.
|
| [10] |
HAMMAMI A. Uncertainty principles for the HankelGabor transform[J]. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2020, 51(1):251-264.
|
| [11] |
刘庆强, 郑长敏, 何红凯, 等. 一种基于小波阈值的变步长LMS语音降噪算法[J].吉林大学学报(理学版), 2022, 60(4):943-949.
|
|
LIU Q Q, ZHENG C M, HE H K, et al. A variable step size LMS speech denoising algorithm based on wavelet threshold[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Science Edition), 2022, 60(4):943-949. (in Chinese)
|
| [12] |
张颖, 马承泽, 杨平, 等. 基于小波变换和改进PCA的人脸特征提取算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(理学版), 2021, 59(6): 1499-1503.
|
|
ZHANG Y, MA C Z, YANG P, et al. Face feature extraction algorithm based on wavelet transform and improved principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Science Edition), 2021, 59(6): 1499-1503. (in Chinese)
|
| [13] |
ZHANG X L, WANG Z L, LU C. Fault diagnosis of gearbox based on the nonlinear output frequency response functions and PNN[J]. Vibroengineering Procedia, 2018, 19:71-75.
|
| [14] |
WANG H H, WANG P, LIU T. Power quality disturbance classification using the stransform and probabilistic neural network[J]. Energies, doi:10.3390/en10010107.
|
| [15] |
CHEN L, HAN W, HUANG Y H, et al. Online fault diagnosis for photovoltaic modules based on probabilistic neural network[J]. European Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2019, 21(3): 317-325.
|
|
|
|
