Abstract As the deepening and development of the “Fengqiao Experience” in the New Era, the litigation source governance is not only an important part of the preventive legal system, but also an important starting point to bring more legal forces into legal guidance, thus of great significance for promoting the modernization of the social governance system and capacity. So far, some local models with different highlights have been gradually formed in the process of practice and exploration. However, there are many problems in the basic consensus, standardization and effectiveness, such as vague specific functions and objectives, separation of resources, unclear subject positioning, almost no procedural option, and insufficient multiple diversion and non-connection before litigation. So, it is necessary to find a conceptual consensus of litigation source governance and shape the systemic logic of the litigation system. We can clarify the objectives and responsibilities, and optimize the allocation of resources by constructing the basic pattern of litigation source governance under the leadership of the CPC Committees; we can improve the construction of preventive legal system and non-litigation dispute resolution system to strengthen the front-end resolution and multiple diversion; we can further standardize the litigation and non-litigation connection procedures to enhance the system value of connection; we can promote the standardization and effectiveness of litigation source governance through the guarantee mechanism of personnel allocation, funding guarantee and demonstration promotion.
|
|
Fund: |
|
|
|