|
|
Effects of recycled agricultural wastes on tomato quality, yield and soil NPK nutrient content in protected house |
LIU Zhongliang1, ZHANG Yanyan1, GU Duanyin1, JIAO Juan1, GAO Junjie1*, LIU Shiqi2,3 |
1.Taian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taian, Shandong 271018, China; 2.College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong 271018, China; 3.Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology, Taian, Shandong 271018, China |
|
|
Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate effects of recycled agricultural wastes on tomato quality and yield as well as soil NPK content, a tomato variety "Jinpeng 8" was used as test plant, and eight treatments of mushroom dregs, rice husk and wheat straw were designed, i.e. CK 0∶0∶0, T1 2∶0∶1, T2 0∶1∶2, T3 1∶2∶0, T4 1∶1∶1, T5 1∶0∶2, T6 2∶1∶0 and T7 0∶2∶1. The influence of agricultural wastes on the fruit yield, quality and soil NPK content were clarified experimentally. Results showed that the agricultural wastes increased soluble sugar, VC and lycopene content of tomato fruit, decreased organic acid content and intensified the sugar-to-acid ratio. The soluble sugar content in the fruit reached the maximum 3.30% in treatment T4, while the organic acid content was the lowest 0.30%. The sugar-to-acid ratio were 7.21, 8.49 and 8.60, respectively, in treatments T1, T2 and T5, and were better than those in treatment CK. The VC content was(9.62-17.54)×10-2 mg/g, increased by 33.16%-82.33% in comparison with treatment CK, and the differences in the content were statistically significant among the treatments. The lycopene content was as high as 82.88 mg/kg and 80.80 mg/kg in treatments T4 and T2, respectively, increased by 47.11% and 43.41% compared with those in treatment CK. In addition, the yield reached the highest of 100 927.02 kg/hm2 in treatment T2, increased by 31.41% compared with treatment CK and was subject to statistical significance. In treatment T3, the alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen content was at the highest of 131.26 mg/kg. The available phosphorus content in each treatment was significantly higher than treatment CK. The available kalium content was in a range of 127.02-155.03 mg/kg. The organic matter content in treatment T6 was at the highest of 1.60 g/kg. Comprehensively considering yield, quality and the other indices, treatment T2 was the better one.
|
Received: 08 June 2017
|
|
|
|
[1]李天来,杨丽娟.作物连作障碍的克服——难解的问题[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(5):916-918. LI Tianlai, YANG Lijuan. Overcoming continuous cropping obstacles—the difficult problem[J]. Scientia agricultura sinica, 2016,49(5):916-918.(in Chinese)[2]WANG Yajing, BI Yuyun, GAO Chunyu. The assessment and utilization of straw resources in China[J]. Agricultural sciences in China, 2010,9(12):1807-1815.[3]王淑兰,王浩,李娟,等.不同耕作方式下长期秸秆还田对旱作春玉米田土壤碳、氮、水含量及产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1530-1540. WANG Shulan, WANG Hao, LI Juan, et al. Effects of long-term straw mulching on soil organic carbon, nitrogen and moisture and spring maize yield on rain-fed croplands under different patterns of soil tillage practice[J]. Chinese journal of applied ecology, 2016,27(5):1530-1540.(in Chinese)[4]周运来,张振华,范如芹,等.秸秆还田方式对水稻田土壤理化性质及水稻产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,32(4):786-790. ZHOU Yunlai, ZHANG Zhenhua, FAN Ruqin, et al. Effects of straw-returning modes on paddy soil properties and rice yield[J]. Jiangsu journal of agricultural sciences, 2016,32(4):786-790.(in Chinese)[5]宫再英.秸秆残体还田对黄瓜幼苗生长及土壤微生物菌群的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2016.[6]高青海,贾双双,郭远远.秸秆集中深还田对设施连作土壤微生物区系和甜瓜根系生长的影响[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(6):1447-1452. GAO Qinghai, JIA Shuangshuang, GUO Yuanyuan. Effect of deeply and concentrated straw returning on soil microbial community and melon root growth in continuously cropped greenhouse soil[J]. Chinese journal of ecology, 2016,35(6):1447-1452.(in Chinese)[7]田平平,何铭烽,李碧瑶,等.施用不同草菇菌渣对生菜产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报,2015,49(2):203-207. TIAN Pingping, HE Mingfeng, LI Biyao, et al. Effect of straw mushroom residue on soil lettuce yield and quality and soil physicochemical property[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2015,49(2):203-207.(in Chinese)[8]高青海,陆晓民,贾双双. 不同作物秸秆还田对设施黄瓜生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2013,33(10):2065-2070. GAO Qinghai, LU Xiaomin, JIA Shuangshuang. Effects of different drop straw returnings on growth and photosynthesis characteristic of cucumber[J]. Acta botanica boreali-occidentalia sinica, 2013,33(10):2065-2070.(in Chinese)[9]张新建,赵秋,宁晓光. 以麦秸腐熟物为主体的基质对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2015,43(10):201-202,379. ZHANG Xinjian, ZHAO Qiu, NING Xiaoguang. Effects of wheat straw decomposed substance on tomato seedling growth[J]. Jiangsu agricultural sciences, 2015,43(10):201-202,379.(in Chinese)[10]梁海恬,何宗均,高贤彪,等. 菇渣、草炭、蛭石混合基质化处理产物对番茄苗期发育特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2015,30(4):194-199. LIANG Haitian, HE Zongjun, GAO Xianbiao, et al. Influences of mushroom residue, peat and vermiculite matrix product on the growth characteristics of tomato seedlings[J]. Acta agriculturae boreali-sinica, 2015,30(4):194-199.(in Chinese)[11]吕晓惠,杨宁,李海燕,等.菌渣部分替代草炭对樱桃番茄生长及养分吸收的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(4):63-67. LYU Xiaohui, YANG Ning, LI Haiyan, et al. Study on compound substrate properties with spent mushroom compost and effects on cherry tomato growth[J]. Chinese agricultural science bulletin, 2016,32(4):63-67.(in Chinese)[12]徐鹤林,李景富.中国番茄[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2007.[13]蔬菜及制品中番茄红素的测定 高效液相色谱法:NY/T 1651—2008 [S].[14]李小方,张志良. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 5版. 北京:高等教育出版社,2016.[15]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.[16]霍建勇,刘静,冯辉,等. 番茄果实风味品质研究进展[J]. 中国蔬菜,2005(2):34-36. HUO Jianyong, LIU Jing, FENG Hui, et al. Research progress of tomato fruit flavor quality[J]. China vegetables, 2005(2):34-36.(in Chinese)[17]徐学忠,胡靖锋,杨红丽,等. 菌渣有机肥在大白菜生产中的应用研究[J]. 福建农业学报,2015,30(7):675-678. XU Xuezhong, HU Jingfeng, YANG Hongli, et al. Mushroom dregs for Chinese cabbage cultivation[J]. Fujian journal of agricultural sciences, 2015,30(7):675-678.(in Chinese)[18]范弟武,李秀芝,黄斌,等. 稻壳炭施加对设施土壤的改良效果[J]. 江苏农业学报,2016,32(2):345-350. FAN Diwu, LI Xiuzhi, HUANG Bin, et al. Improving effects of rice husk char on greenhouse soil[J]. Jiangsu journal of agricultural sciences, 2016,32(2):345-350.(in Chinese)[19]徐国伟,段骅,王志琴,等. 麦秸还田对土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2009,42(3):934-942. XU Guowei, DUAN Hua, WANG Zhiqin, et al. Effect of wheat-residue application on physical and chemical characters and enzymatic activities in soil[J]. Scientia agricultura sinica, 2009,42(3):934-942.(in Chinese)[20]姜超强,郑青松,祖朝龙. 秸秆还田对土壤钾素的影响及其替代钾肥效应研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志,2015,34(4):1158-1165. JIANG Chaoqiang, ZHENG Qingsong, ZU Chaolong. Research progress on effects of straw returning on soil potassium and its substitute for po-tassium fertilizer[J]. Chinese journal of ecology, 2015,34(4):1158-1165.(in Chinese)[21]常介田,张翠翠,孟祥远,等. 麦秸直接还田对作物产量及培肥土壤效应分析[J]. 中国农学通报,2012,28(8):213-216. CHANG Jietian, ZHANG Cuicui, MENG Xiangyuan, et al. Study on the effects of returning wheat straws to fields directly on raising the yield of crops and fertilizing soil[J]. Chinese agricultural science bulletin, 2012,28(8):213-216.(in Chinese)[22]KAUR N, BENIPAL D S. Effect of crop residue and farmyard manure on K forms on soils of long term fertility experiment[J]. Indian journal of crop science, 2006,1(1/2):161-164.[23]邓欧平,李瀚,周稀,等. 菌渣还田对土壤有效养分动态变化的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2014(4):18-23. DENG Ouping, LI Han, ZHOU Xi, et al. Effect of spent mushroom substrates on dynamic changes of soil available nutrients in rice-wheat rotation[J]. Soil and fertilizer sciences in China, 2014(4):18-23.(in Chinese) |
[1] |
. [J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engin, 2018, 36(7): 553-559. |
|
|
|
|