|
|
|
| Unstable head-flow characteristics of pump-turbine under different guide vane openings in pump mode |
| LI Deyou1, GONG Ruzhi1, WANG Hongjie1, WEI Xianzhu1, 2, LIU Zhansheng1, QIN Daqing1, 2 |
| 1.School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Power Equipment, Harbin Institute of Large Electrical Machinery, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to obtain the unstable head-flow characteristics of pump-turbines under different guide vane openings, firstly, experiments are carried out on the pump-turbine model for a pump storage power plant in pump mode. It is shown that the head gets higher and its slope becomes stepper at a low flow rate; the unstable head-flow effect exhibits more obviously with decreasing guide vane opening, but the flow rate range for the effect is shrunk. Further, a 3D geometrical model of the pump-turbine model is generated and a set of mesh for its fluid domain is created. The steady turbulent flows in in the pump-turbine model are simulated by using the SST k-ω, standard k-ω, RNG k-ε and standard k-ε turbulence models at various flow rates under 19 mm guide vane opening, showing the SST k-ω turbulence model can result in more accurate performance curves than the others against the experimental measurements. Consequently, the flows in the pump-turbine model are simulated by means of that turbulence model at 13 mm, 19 mm and 25 mm guide vane openings and the head, torque and efficiency curves are obtained and compared with the experimental observations, and good agreement is demonstrated between them. Finally, the internal flow patterns in the unstable region, at part-load, best efficiency and over-load points are analysed at 19 mm guide vane opening. It is identified that the unstable head-flow effect is related to flow separation and vortex occurrence in the runner and a few stay vane passages.
|
|
Received: 26 March 2015
|
|
|
|
| [1]IKEDA K, INAGAKI M, Niikura K et al. 700-m 400-MW class ultrahigh-head pump turbine[J]. Hitachi review, 2000, 49(2): 81-87.[2]YANG J, PRAVESI G, YUAN S, et al. Experimental characterization of a pump-turbine in pump mode at hump instability region[J]. Journal of fluids engineering, 2015, 137:051109.[3]陈顺义,李成军,周杰,等. 水泵水轮机稳定性预判与对策[J].水力发电,2011,37(12):50-54. CHEN Shunyi, LI Chengjun, ZHOU Jie, et al. Prognosis on the stability of pump-turbine and the countermeasures[J]. Water power, 2011, 37(12): 50-54.(in Chinese)[4]张兰金,纪兴英,常近时. 水泵水轮机泵工况转轮流场分析[J]. 农业机械学报,2008,39(4):69-82. ZHANG Lanjin, JI Xingying, CHANG Jinshi. Flow analysis of the pump-turbine runner in the pump mode[J]. Transactions of the Chinese society for agricultural machinery, 2008, 39(4): 69-82.(in Chinese)[5]王旭鹤,祝宝山,樊红刚,等. 水泵水轮机转轮的三维反问题设计和特性研究[J]. 农业机械学报,2014,45(12):93-98,116. WANG Xuhe, ZHU Baoshan, FAN Honggang, et al. 3D inverse design and performance investigation of a pump-turbine runner[J]. Transactions of the Chinese society for agricultural machinery, 2014,45(12):93-98,116.(in Chinese)[6]BRAUN O, KUENY J L, AVELLAN F. Numerical analysis of flow phenomena related to the unstable energy-discharge characteristic of a pump-turbine in pump mode[C]//Proceedings of the 2005 ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting and Exhibition. Houston, USA:[s.n.],2005.[7]陶然, 肖若富, 杨魏, 等. 可逆式水泵水轮机泵工况的驼峰特性[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2014, 32(11): 927-930,936. TAO Ran, XIAO Ruofu, YANG Wei, et al. Hump characteristic of reversible pump-turbine in pump mode[J]. Journal of drainage and irrigation machinery engineering, 2014, 32(11): 927-930, 936.(in Chinese)[8]王焕茂. 混流式水泵水轮机驼峰区数值模拟及试验研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2009.[9]王焕茂,吴钢,吴伟章,等. 混流式水泵水轮机驼峰区数值模拟及分析[J]. 水力发电学报,2012(6): 253-258. WANG Huanmao, WU Gang, WU Weizhang, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis of the hump district of Francis pump-turbine[J]. Journal of hydroelectric engineering, 2012(6): 253-258.(in Chinese)[10]冉红娟,张瑶,罗先武,等. 可逆式水轮机泵工况下驼峰现象的数值模拟[J]. 水力发电学报,2011(3): 175-179. RAN Hongjuan, ZHANG Yao, LUO Xianwu, et al. Numerical simulation of the positive-slope performance curve of a reversible hydro-turbine in pumping mode[J]. Journal of hydroelectric engineering, 2011(3): 175-179.(in Chinese)[11]舒崚峰. 水泵水轮机驼峰区与“S”区数值模拟研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2013.[12]LI D Y, WANG H J, XIANG G M, et al. Unsteady simulation and analysis for hump characteristics of a pump turbine model[J]. Renewable energy, 2015, 77: 32-42.[13]LIU J T, LIU S H, WU Y L, et al. Numerical investigation of the hump characteristic of a pump-turbine based on an improved cavitation model[J]. Computer & fluids, 2012, 68: 105-111.[14]覃大清,张乐福. 关于水泵水轮机最高扬程驼峰区安全裕度选取的建议[J]. 大电机技术,2006(4):46-48. QIN Daqing, ZHANG Lefu. The proposal for the hump safety margin at pump maximum head of pump turbine[J]. Large electric machine and hydraulic turbine, 2006(4): 46-48.(in Chinese)[15]李德友,王洪杰,宫汝志,等. 基于LabVIEW水轮机模型测试系统设计与试验[J]. 水力发电学报. 2014, 33(4): 263-268. LI Deyou, WANG Hongjie, GONG Ruzhi, et al. Design and experiment of turbine model testing system based on LabVIEW[J]. Journal of hydroelectric engineering, 2014, 33(4): 263-268.(in Chinese) |
|
|
|
