排灌机械工程学报
   首页  学报介绍  编 委 会  作者园地  征订启事  编校法规  编读往来  录用公告  广告合作   行业新闻  留  言  English 
排灌机械工程学报  2019, Vol. 37 Issue (7): 562-567    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.17.0224
泵理论与技术 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
不同级数深井离心泵性能的数值模拟与试验
施卫东1,2*,侯云鹤1,周岭1,李跃民3,薛少辉3
1. 江苏大学国家水泵及系统工程技术研究中心, 江苏 镇江 212013; 2. 南通大学机械工程学院, 江苏 南通 226019; 3. 山西天海泵业有限公司, 山西 运城 044000
Numerical simulation and test of performance of deep-well centrifugal pumps with different stages
SHI Weidong 1,2*, HOU Yunhe 1, ZHOU Ling 1, LI Yuemin 3, XUE Shaohui 3
1. National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; 2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226019, China; 3. Shanxi Skysea Pump Limited, Yuncheng, Shanxi 044000, China
 全文: PDF (7161 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 选取250QJ80型深井离心泵作为研究对象,借助数值模拟和试验研究的方法,研究不同级数时深井泵性能的变化规律,并通过分析内部流场探究不同级数深井离心泵性能变化规律的本质原因.采用ANSYS-CFX 17.0软件对该深井离心泵模型在单级、两级以及三级时的性能分别进行了数值预测.对3组模型分别进行计算域建模,结构化网格划分,进而基于标准k-ε湍流模型和标准壁面函数进行多工况数值模拟,获得级数不同时深井离心泵的性能预测值,并将数值预测结果与试验结果进行对比分析.结果表明:深井离心泵级数的变化并不会对某一特定级数的性能造成影响,两级与三级离心泵首级扬程与效率高于其后各级,其后各级的扬程与效率差异不大.造成这些相似性与差异性的主要原因是:深井泵首级叶轮进口处的介质为无预旋入流,而当级数大于等于2级时,其后各级叶轮进口处的介质均存在一定的旋转分量.
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
施卫东
*
侯云鹤
周岭
李跃民
薛少辉
关键词井用潜水泵   级数   流场分布   数值模拟   试验     
Abstract: A deep-well centrifugal pump of type 250QJ80 was chosen to be study model and features of the pump performance at different numbers of stages were explored numerically and experimentally, further the root causes for these features were clarified in terms of analysis of internal flow field in the pump. In the paper, software ANSYS-CFX 17.0 was used to carry out numerical predictions on the pump performance based on three pump models with single stage, two stages and three stages, respectively. The computational domain of three models has experienced geometrical modelling and structured-mesh creation, then the water flow field in these models were simulated under a few working conditions based on the standard k-ε turbulence model and standard wall function. The predicted performance of these models was obtained, compared and analyzed against the corresponding experimental data. The results show that the change in pump stages doesn′t affect the performance of the pump with a specific number of stages. However, the head and efficiency of the first stage are higher than those of the se-cond or third stages, while the head and efficiency of the second stage doesn′t differ obviously from the third stage. The main reason for this similarity and difference in the head and efficiency is that the impeller of the first stage is without any pre-swirl, while the impellers of the rest stages are subject to a certain amount of pre-swirl.
Key wordssubmersible well-pump   stages   flow field distribution   numerical simulation   experiment   
收稿日期: 2017-10-10;
基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51609106);江苏省自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(BK20150508);中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2017T100331);江苏大学高级人才启动基金资助项目(15JDG047)
引用本文:   
施卫东,*,侯云鹤等. 不同级数深井离心泵性能的数值模拟与试验[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(7): 562-567.
SHI Wei-Dong-,*,HOU Yun-He- et al. Numerical simulation and test of performance of deep-well centrifugal pumps with different stages[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engin, 2019, 37(7): 562-567.
 
[1] 施卫东,王洪亮,余学军,等. 深井泵的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 农机化研究, 2009, 27(1):74-76.
SHI Weidong, WANG Hongliang, YU Xuejun, et al. Research status and development trend of deep well pump[J]. Journal of agricultural mechanization research, 2009, 27(1):74-76.(in Chinese)
[2] ZHOU L, SHI W, WU S. Performance optimization in a centrifugal pump impeller by orthogonal experiment and numerical simulation[J]. Advances in mechanical engineering, 2013(1):31-41.
[3] 曹宁, 高莹, 马斌. 末级密封间隙对自平衡多级离心泵性能的影响[J]. 流体机械, 2018, 46(6):22-26.
CAO Ning, GAO Ying, MA Bin, et al. Effect of final-stage seal clearance on performance of self-balancing multistage centrifugal pump[J].Fluid machinery,2018, 46(6):22-26.(in Chinese)
[4] 张霞,袁寿其,张金凤,等.不同叶片包角对螺旋形单蜗壳离心泵叶轮径向力特性的影响[J].流体机械,2017,45(1):43-47.
ZHANG Xia,YUAN Shouqi,ZHANG Jinfeng,et al. Effect of different blade wrap angle on impeller radial force for a hedical single spiral volute centrifugal pump[J].Fluid machinery,2017,45(1):43-47.(in Chinese)
[5] 黄思, 桑迪科. 多级离心泵三维流场数值模拟及性能预测[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2010, 29(6):705-708.
HUANG Si, SANG Dike. Numerical simulation of the three-dimensional flow field in a multistage centrifugal pump and its performance prediction[J]. Mechanical science & technology for aerospace engineering, 2010, 29(6):705-708.(in Chinese)
[6] 周岭, 白玲, 杨阳,等. 导叶叶片数对井用潜水泵性能的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(10):78-84.
ZHOU Ling, BAI Ling, YANG Yang, et al. Influence of diffuser vane number on submersible well pump perfor-mance[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2016, 47(10): 78-84.(in Chinese)
[7] 施卫东,杨阳,周岭,等. 潜水泵缩比模型的相似性验证与内部流场分析[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(3):50-57.
SHI Weidong, YANG Yang, ZHOU Ling, et al. Verification of comparability and analysis of inner flow fields on scaling models of submersible well pump[J].Tran-sactions of the CSAE, 2017, 33(3):50-57.(in Chinese)
[8] SHUKLA S N, KSHIRSAGAR J T. Numerical experiments on a centrifugal pump[C]// Proceedings of the ASME 2002 Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Division Conference, 2002:709-719.
[9] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J].AIAA joumal,1994,32(8):1598-1605.
[10] 苗森春, 杨军虎, 王晓晖,等. 叶片数对泵作液力透平的性能影响[J]. 流体机械, 2018,46(1):1-5.
MIAO Senchun,YANG Junhu,WANG Xiaohui,et al. Effect on blade number on performance of pump as turbine[J].Fluid machinery,2018,46(1):1-5.(in Chinese)
[1] 张人会,*,张四代,田磊,陈学炳. 射流式离心泵性能及内部流动特性[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(9): 763-768.
[2] 冯晓东,*,王磊,马宇,王亚辉. 核主泵滑油冷却器的设计与试验研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(8): 650-655.
[3] 宋煜,顾希尧,刘迎圆,尹俊连,王德忠*. 不同数值计算方法对核主泵压力脉动性能的数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(8): 645-649.
[4] 徐海良,*,周永兴,杨放琼,,吴波,. 进料流量对深海矿石输送设备内流特性影响分析[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(7): 618-624.
[5] 袁建平,邓凡杰,张克玉,崔强磊,司乔瑞*. 气液两相流下叶片泵内部流动研究现状[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(7): 553-561.
[6] 王燕燕,,赵伟国,*,韩向东,,郑英杰,. 基于叶片包角和出口安放角对叶轮的改进设计[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(7): 574-579.
[7] 刘建河,李星光*,许晏铭. 喷针-环形电极配置对感应荷电喷雾的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(6): 521-527.
[8] 岑春海,潘中永*,王雪豹. 喷水推进器全流道空化流动数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(6): 528-533.
[9] 杨孙圣,邵珂*,戴韬. 叶片包角对混流泵作透平的特性影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(6): 475-479.
[10] 岳书波,张鸿清*,刁明军,代尚逸. 泄洪闸胸墙压坡段的数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(6): 491-497.
[11] 周颖,郑源*,何中伟,孙奥冉,张付林,汪昊蓝. 大型轴流泵反向发电压力脉动及流固耦合[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(6): 480-485.
[12] 俞芸芸,周大庆*,戴启璠,梁豪杰,仲子夜. 轴流泵叶轮的三维多参数设计及试验[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(5): 393-399.
[13] 赵道利*,高诚锋,孙维鹏,郭鹏程,马薇. 泄水锥加长与主轴中心孔补水对水轮机尾水管流态的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(5): 413-419.
[14] 江伟*,蒋婷, 朱相源. 余热利用换热器硫酸和水蒸气耦合凝结数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(5): 420-426.
[15] 张凌峰,孙见君*,马晨波,张玉言. 一种钠冷快堆核主泵动静压导轴承间隙流体动力特性分析[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(5): 427-434.

江苏大学梦溪校区(镇江市梦溪园巷30号)图书馆5楼 0511-84440893 传真0511--84440033
Copyright 江苏大学杂志社 2010-2015 All Rights Reserved