排灌机械工程学报
   首页  学报介绍  编 委 会  作者园地  征订启事  编校法规  编读往来  录用公告  广告合作   行业新闻  留  言  English 
排灌机械工程学报  2018, Vol. 36 Issue (8): 732-737    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.18.1022
泵理论与技术 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
河套灌区井渠结合地下水数值模拟及均衡分析
杨洋1, 朱焱1*, 伍靖伟1, 余乐时2, 杨金忠1
1.武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430072; 2.福建省三明市尤溪县政府办公室, 福建 三明 365100
Numerical modeling and water balance analysis of groundwater under conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water in Hetao Irrigation District
YANG Yang1, ZHU Yan1*, WU Jingwei1, YU Leshi2, YANG Jinzhong1
1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2.Youxi County Government of Sanming, Fujian Province, Sanming, Fujian 365100, China
 全文: PDF (1858 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 建立了河套灌区三维地下水数值模型,用2006—2013年灌区实测地下水埋深资料对模型进行率定和验证,并在规划的井渠结合区内,设置3种不同井灌区灌溉定额和3种秋浇频率,组合共9种井渠结合节水情景,分别分析了9种节水情景下的地下水动态变化.结果表明:井渠结合后全灌区地下水埋深范围为1.863~2.029 m,较现状条件增加0.084~0.250 m;不同灌域结合区井渠结合后地下水埋深差别很大,解放闸结合区地下水埋深最大,为2.308~2.803 m,永济结合区地下水埋深最小,为2.079~2.455 m;井渠结合后,入渗补给量减少2.01×108 ~3.63×108 m3/a,潜水蒸发量减少1.69×108 ~3.03×108 m3/a.
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨洋
朱焱*
伍靖伟
余乐时
杨金忠
关键词地下水   数值模拟   井渠结合   节水   河套灌区     
Abstract: A three-dimensional groundwater model of Hetao Irrigation District was established. Model parameters were calibrated and validated with datasets from 2006 to 2013. Then, the numerical model was applied to estimate the impacts of conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water under 9 water saving scenarios with 3 different irrigation quotas and 3 autumn irrigation frequencies. The simulating results indicate that the water table depth is 1.863-2.029 m in the whole district, which increases by 0.084-0.250 m compared with that before the conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water. The value of groundwater decline varies considerably in different conjunctive areas. The deepest water table depth is in Jiefangzha conjunctive area, which is 2.308-2.803 m. And the shallowest is 2.079-2.455 m in Yongji conjunctive area. The amouns of recharge and phreatic water evaporation decreases by 2.01×108-3.63×108 m3/a and 1.69×108-3.03×108 m3/a respectively.
Key wordsgroundwater   numerical simulation   conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water   water-saving   Hetao Irrigation District   
收稿日期: 2018-04-09;
基金资助:

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0403304);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51779178,51479143)

引用本文:   
杨洋,朱焱*,伍靖伟等. 河套灌区井渠结合地下水数值模拟及均衡分析[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(8): 732-737.
YANG Yang-,ZHU Yan-*,WU Jing-Wei- et al. Numerical modeling and water balance analysis of groundwater under conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water in Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engin, 2018, 36(8): 732-737.
 
[1] 谢磊. 河北省井渠结合灌区节水改造及其对地下水位影响问题研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2017.
[2] 李建承, 魏晓妹, 邓康婕. 基于地下水均衡的灌区合理渠井用水比例[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2015,33(3):260-266. 浏览
LI Jiancheng, WEI Xiaomei, DENG Kangjie. Reasonable canal-to-well irrigation water quantity ratio in irrigation district based on groundwater balance[J]. Journal of drainage and irrigation machinery engineering, 2015,33(3):260-266.(in Chinese)
[3] 周维博. 人工神经网络理论在井渠结合灌区地下水动态预报中的应用[J]. 西北水资源与水工程, 2003,14(2):5-9.
ZHOU Weibo. Application of artificial neural networks to groundwater level forecast for irrigation district with well and canal[J]. Northwest water resources & water engineering, 2003,14(2):5-9.(in Chinese)
[4] XU Xu, HUANG Guanhua, QU Zhongyi, et al. Asses-sing the groundwater dynamics and impacts of water sa-ving in the Hetao irrigation district, Yellow River basin[J]. Agricultural water management, 2010,98(2):301-313.
[5] 王亚东. 河套灌区节水改造工程实施前后区域地下水位变化的分析[J]. 节水灌溉, 2002(3):15-17.
[6] WANG Yadong. Analysis on changes of groundwater table before and after water saving reconstruction in Hetao irrigation district[J]. Water saving irrigation, 2002(3):15-17.(in Chinese)
[7] 黄莹, 胡铁松, 范筱林. 河套灌区永济灌域地下水数值模拟[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2010(2):79-83.
[8] HUANG Ying, HU Tiesong, FAN Xiaolin. Numerical simulation of groundwater in Yongji irrigation area in Hetao irrigation district[J]. China rural water and hydropower, 2010(2):79-83.(in Chinese)
[9] 白忠, 徐旭. 河套灌区解放闸灌域地下水数值模拟[J]. 节水灌溉, 2008(2):28-31.
[10] BAI Zhong, XU Xu. Numerical simulation of the groundwater and salt dynamics in Jiefangzha irrigation scheme of Hetao irrigation district[J]. Water saving irrigation, 2008(2):28-31.(in Chinese)
[11] 何彬, 赖斌, 毛威, 等. 基于GIS的河套灌区井渠结合分布区的确定方法[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2016,35(2):7-12.
HE Bin, LAI Bin, MAO Wei, et al. A distribution-determination method of conjunction use district with groundwater and surface water for Hetao irrigation district based on GIS[J]. Journal of irrigation an drainage, 2016,35(2):7-12.(in Chinese)
[12] 王璐瑶, 彭培艺, 郝培静, 等. 基于采补平衡的河套灌区井渠结合模式及节水潜力[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2016(8):18-24.
[13] WANG Luyao, PENG Peiyi, HAO Peijing, et al. Well-canal conjunctive irrigation mode and potential of water-saving amount based on the balance of exploitation and supplement for Hetao irrigation district[J]. China rural water and hydropower, 2016(8):18-24.(in Chinese)
[1] 于贤磊, 陈松山, 杨夏威, 周明耀*. 大型灌溉管网减压阀特性数模分析与试验研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(9): 824-828.
[2] 陈为升, 黎耀军*, 严海军, 张铭振. 进水方式对卷盘式喷灌机水涡轮水力性能影响的数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(9): 845-850.
[3] 江显群, 陈武奋*. BP神经网络与GA-BP农作物需水量预测模型对比[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(8): 762-766.
[4] 郭相平,, 余涛, 吴梦洋, 高爽, 操信春,*. 中国省区虚拟水流动及对农业用水的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(8): 744-749.
[5] 唐苑峰, 袁建平*, 司乔瑞, 张克玉, 陆荣. 基于Eulerian-Eulerian模型的轴流泵气液两相流动数值研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(6): 478-484.
[6] 钟伟源*, 朱荣生, 王秀礼, 卢永刚, 刘永, 康俊鋆. 基于双向流固耦合的核主泵叶轮力学特性[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(6): 485-493.
[7] 潘志军, 徐磊*, 沈晓燕, 洪飞, 张浩. 杭州八堡泵站斜式泵装置流道水力优化[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(6): 501-508.
[8] 程效锐,*, 符丽, 包文瑞. 核主泵空化流动对能量转换的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(5): 369-376.
[9] 王麦琪, 李彦军*, 袁寿其, 孟凡. 双向流道轴流泵装置的飞逸特性[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(5): 384-390.
[10] 刘刚, 付强*, 朱荣生, 王秀礼, 张本营, 李梦圆. 超临界锅炉给水泵级间密封间隙流动特性[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(5): 391-396.
[11] 韩伟,, 陈雨, 刘宜,*, 李光贤, 王洁, 王腾达. 水轮机活动导叶端面间隙磨蚀特性数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(5): 404-412.
[12] 何福娟*, 李王成, 闫文杰. 基于动态集对分析模型的地下水水质评价[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(5): 433-438.
[13] 李岩,*, 吴志诚, 田川公太朗, 冯放,, 张婷婷, 白荣彬, 李建业. 偏心风轮结构对垂直轴风力机气动特性影响数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(5): 413-419.
[14] 陆静*, 程俊. JP75型卷盘式喷灌机水涡轮能量转换数值模拟分析[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(5): 448-453.
[15] 张坤,, 陈颂英,*. 自激脉冲空化喷嘴三维非稳态流动的数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(4): 288-293.

江苏大学梦溪校区(镇江市梦溪园巷30号)图书馆5楼 0511-84440893 传真0511--84440033
Copyright 江苏大学杂志社 2010-2015 All Rights Reserved