参数不确定性对地下水数值模拟结果可靠性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.17.0175

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (2360 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要以标准矩形为研究区,按介质渗透系数差异将研究区划分为4个单元,应用HydroGeoSphere模拟系统建立数值模型,以含水层渗透系数为目标参数,分析不同参数分区的灵敏度系数;选择高灵敏度的分区建立渗透系数随机场,进行参数不确定随机模拟,分析模拟结果相对确定性模型的可靠度.结果表明:位于模型最顶层的单元1内渗透系数灵敏度最大,这与该单元的分布位置直接相关;随机模拟得到的压力水头按一定频率分布,确定性模型所得到的压力水头变化值290.52 cm出现的频率仅为7%;当认为确定性模型结果的可靠度为100%时,随机模拟结果相对于确定性模型结果的可靠性明显降低,这表明考虑到参数的不确定性时,模拟结果与确定性模型结果存在显著差异.随机模拟结果的概率性分布特征可以更加真实地表达实际情况,有利于水资源决策性管理的风险规避.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘派

关键词 ： S273.4, P641

Abstract：A rectangular aquifer domain served as a study region for groundwater numerical simulations. The region was divided into four zones according to differences in hydraulic conductivity. A numerical simulation model was established by using the HydroGeoSphere simulation system. The sensitivity coefficient was analyzed in those aquifer zones when the permeability coefficient of the aquifer was used as an objective parameter. A stochastic simulation was conducted to evaluate the reliability of the results produced by deterministic model and stochastic model. Results showed that the permeability coefficient in top element 1 was the most sensitive. This fact may be related to the zone location directly. Based on the stochastic model, the pressure head was distributed in a certain probability. According to the deterministic model, the frequency of 290.52 cm pressure head variation was 7% only. When the reliability of deterministic model was considered as 100%, the reliability of stochastic model was reduced remarkably. This suggested that there was a significant difference in the results predicted by the stochastic model from those by the deterministic model. Since the probabilistic distribution characteristics in the results of stochastic model can represent the actual situation of groundwater more realistically, the stochastic model is favor of risk evasion in groundwater resources decision-making management.

Key words： groundwater parameter uncertainty stochastic model sensitivity reliability

收稿日期: 2017-08-05

通讯作者: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41602247);沈阳工学院青年骨干教师科研基金资助项目(QN201713)

引用本文:

刘派. 参数不确定性对地下水数值模拟结果可靠性的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(7): 593-598. LIU Pai. Influence of parameter uncertainty on reliability of groundwater numerical simulation results. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engin, 2018, 36(7): 593-598.

链接本文:

http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/pgjx/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.17.0175 或 http://zzs.ujs.edu.cn/pgjx/CN/Y2018/V36/I7/593

[1]吴吉春,陆乐.地下水模拟不确定性分析[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,47(3):227-234.
　　WU Jichun,LU Le. Uncertainty analysis for groundwater modeling[J]. Journal of Nanjing University(natural sciences),2011,47(3):227-234.(in Chinese)
[2]WU Jichun,ZENG Xiankui. Review of the uncertainty analysis of groundwater numerical simulation[J]. Chinese science bulletin,2013,58(25):3044-3052.
[3]张博,李国秀,程品,等. 基于随机理论的地下水环境风险评价[J]. 水科学进展,2016,27(1):100-106.
　　ZHANG Bo, LI Guoxiu, CHENG Pin,et al. Groundwater environment risk assessment based on stochastic theory[J]. Advances in water science,2016,27(1):100-106.(in Chinese)
[4]杨金忠,蔡树英,叶自桐.区域地下水溶质运移随机理论的研究与进展[J].水科学进展,1998,9(1):84-98.
　　YANG Jinzhong, CAI Shuying, YE Zitong. A review of stochastic analysis for solute transport at regional scale[J]. Advances in water science,1998,9(1):84-98.(in Chinese)
[5]DAGAN G. Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities:the inverse problem[J]. Water resources research,1985,21(1):65-72.
[6]王晶晶,樊尊荣. 含水层非均质性对地下水蒙特卡罗模拟结果的影响[J].水资源保护,2017,33(1):46-51.
　　WANG Jingjing,FAN Zunrong. Impacts of aquifer hete-rogeneity on Monte Carlo simulation of groundwater[J]. Water resources protection,2017,33(1):46-51.(in Chinese)
[7]覃荣高, 曹广祝, 仵彦卿. 非均质含水层中渗流与溶质运移研究进展[J].地球科学进展, 2014, 29(1):30-41.
　　QIN Ronggao,CAO Guangzhu,WU Yanqing. Review of the study of groundwater flow and solute transport in hete-rogeneous aquifer[J]. Advances in earth science,2014,29(1):30-41.(in Chinese)
[8]SHI Xiaoqing, YE Ming, CURTIS G P,et al. Assessment of parametric uncertainty for groundwater reactive transport modeling[J].Water resources research, 2014,50(5):4416-4439.
[9]杨运,吴吉春,骆乾坤,等. DREAM算法分析地下水数值模拟不确定性的影响因素[J]. 地质论评,2016,62(2):353-361.
　　YANG Yun, WU Jichun, LUO Qiankun,et al. Analysis of the uncertainty of groundwater numerical simulation based on the DREAM algorithm[J]. Geological review,2016,62(2):353-361.(in Chinese)
[10]欧阳琦,卢文喜,侯泽宇,等. 基于替代模型的地下水溶质运移不确定性分析[J]. 中国环境科学,2016,36(4):1119-1124.
　　OUYANG Qi, LU Wenxi, HOU Zeyu, et al. Uncertainty analysis of groundwater solute transport based on surrogate model[J]. China environmental science,2016,36(4):1119-1124.(in Chinese)
[11]束龙仓,刘佩贵,刘波,等. 傍河水源地数学模型的参数灵敏度分析——以辽宁省北票市某傍河水源地为例[J]. 工程勘察,2006(8):29-31.
　　SHU Longcang, LIU Peigui, LIU Bo, et al. Sensitivity analysis on the parameters of the mathematical model[J]. Journal of geotechnical investigation & surveying, 2006(8):29-31.(in Chinese)
[12]陈彦,吴吉春. 含水层渗透系数空间变异性对地下水数值模拟的影响[J]. 水科学进展,2005,16(4):482-487.
　　CHEN Yan, WU Jichun. Effect of the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity in aquifer on the numerical simulation of groundwater[J]. Advances in water scie-nce,2005,16(4):482-487.(in Chinese)
[13]杨金忠,蔡树英,伍靖伟. 宏观水力传导度及弥散度的确定方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2002, 13(2):179-183.
　　YANG Jinzhong, CAI Shuying, WU Jingwei. A method for determining the macro-hydraulic conductivity and-dispersivity[J]. Advances in water science,2002, 13(2):179-183.(in Chinese)
[14]李世峰,白顺果,王月影,等. 非饱和土壤渗透系数空间不确定性对溶质运移的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015,9(3):1471-1476.
　　LI Shifeng, BAI Shunguo, WANG Yueying, et al. Effect of spatial uncertainty of unsaturated zone permeability coefficient on solute transport[J]. Chinese journal of environmental engineering, 2015,9(3):1471-1476.(in Chinese)
[15]FORSYTH P A, WU Y S, PRUESS K. Robust numerical methods for saturated-unsaturated flow with dry initial conditions in heterogeneous media[J]. Advances in water resources,1995,18(1):25-38.
[16]THERRIEN R, MCLAREN R G, SUDICKY E A, et al. HydroGeoSphere: a three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport[R]. Waterloo, Canada:University of Waterloo, 2009.
[17]束龙仓,王茂枚,刘瑞国,等.地下水数值模拟中的参数灵敏度分析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(5):491-495.
　　SHU Longcang, WANG Maomei, LIU Ruiguo, et al. Sensitivity analysis of parameters in numerical simulation of groundwater[J]. Journal of Hohai University(natural sciences), 2007,35(5):491-495.(in Chinese)
[18]LAW J. Statistical approach to the interstitial heterogeneity of sand reservoirs[J]. Transactions of the aime, 1944,155(1):202-221.
[19]FREEZE R A. A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media[J]. Water resources research,1975,11(5):725-741.
[20]温忠辉,曹英杰.开采量不确定条件下数值模拟结果的可靠性分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(2):239-242.
　　WEN Zhonghui, CAO Yingjie. Reliability analysis of numerical simulation results under the condition of groundwater withdrawal uncertainty[J]. Journal of Jilin University(earth science edition), 2007,37(2):239-242.(in Chinese)