Abstract：In order to evaluate the credit of water conservancy project contracting enterprises, using grey system theory, the evaluation index system is established from six aspects of comprehensive quality, competitive ability, management level, financial condition, market behavior and enterprise reputation,using the improved grey relation degree method to determine index weight; in addition, the five grade evaluation standard is put forward, and the grey comprehensive evaluation model is constructed.Using the constructed water conservancy project contracting enterprise credit evaluation grey model and taking the new Shuhe River project in Jiangsu Province as an example of a contracting enterprise credit evaluation,it is concluded that the comprehensive credit rating is "general", which is consistent with the conclusion of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Credit details show that the enterprise has better competitive ability, general management level, general financial condition, general reputation, and needs to be improved in the market behavior, in the future, attention should be paid to improving the construction quality, perfecting the rules and regulations and construction records, strictly implementing the acceptance procedures and safety production, and reasonably arranging the construction schedule. Research shows that the grey comprehensive evaluation model for water conservancy project contracting enterprise credit evaluation is feasible and effective, and helps enterprises to improve their own shortcomings, and is of certain reference value to the optimum ranking of water conservancy project contracting enterprises.
冯婉茹*, 刘永强. 基于灰色综合评价模型的水利工程承包企业信用评价[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(2): 129-135.
FENG Wanru*, LIU Yongqiang. Credit evaluation of water conservancy engineering contracting enterprises based on grey comprehensive evaluation model. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engin, 2018, 36(2): 129-135.
[1]中共中央国务院.关于加快水利改革发展的决定[EB/OL].[2010-12-31].http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-01/29/content_1795245.htm.[2]水利部.水利部关于2016年水利建设市场主体信用评价结果的公告[EB/OL].[2017-01-04].http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zw/tzgs/201702/t20170213_858930.html.[3]王首绪,胡迎迎.基于模糊综合评判法的公路施工企业履约信用评价研究[J].公路工程,2010,35(3):145-148. WANG Shouxu,HU Yingying.Research on contract-fulfillment credit assessment of the high way construction enterprises based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].Highway engineering,2010,35(3):145-148.(in Chinese)[4]傅鸿源,彭天明.基于BP神经网络的建筑企业信用评价体系分析[J].科技管理研究,2008(11):159-170. FU Hongyuan,PENG Tianming.Analysis of credit evalua-tion system for construction enterprises based on BP neural network[J].Science and technology management research,2008(11):159-170.(in Chinese)[5]沈党云,泮俊,钟厚冰.基于TOPSIS的公路施工企业履约信用评价[J].公路交通科技应用技术版,2012(8):392-395. SHEN Dangyun,PAN Jun,ZHONG Houbing.Perfor-mance credit evaluation of highway construction enterprises based on TOPSIS[J].Highway traffic science and technology application technology edition,2012(8):392-395.(in Chinese)[6]任杰,张晓华.离散Hopfield神经网络在施工企业信用评价中的应用[J].宁夏工程技术,2013,12(3):270-276. REN Jie,ZHANG Xiaohua.Study on credit evaluation of construction enterprise based on discrete Hopfield neural network[J].Ningxia engineering technology,2013,12(3):270-276.(in Chinese)[7]郜振华.配送中心选址模型与算法研究[D].南京:东南大学,2005.[8]张成考,聂茂林,吴价宝.基于改进型灰色评价的虚拟企业合作伙伴选择[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,11(11):54-61. ZHANG Chengkao,NIE Maolin,WU Jiabao.Selection of cooperative partners for virtual enterprises based on modi-fied grey evaluation method[J].System engineering theory and practice,2007,11(11):54-61.(in Chinese)[9]崔杰,党耀国,刘思峰.基于灰色关联度求解指标权重的改进方法[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(5):141-145. CUI Jie,DANG Yaoguo,LIU Sifeng.An improved approach for determining weights of attributes in decision making based on grey incidence[J].Chinese journal of management science,2008,16(5):141-145.(in Chinese)[10]水利部.水利部关于印发水利建设市场主体信用评价管理暂行办法的通知[EB/OL].[2015-09-30].http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zw/tzgg/tzgs/20170213_858642.html.[11]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2002.[12]方国华,黄显峰.多目标决策理论、方法及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.[13]刘思峰,谢乃明.灰色系统理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
